-
Draper survives scare to reach Queen's quarter-finals
-
Pant hopes India can make country 'happy again' after plane crash
-
US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors
-
UK risks more extreme, prolonged heatwaves in future: study
-
Gosdens celebrate Royal Ascot double as Buick motors home on Ombudsman
-
Oil prices drop following Trump's Iran comments, US stocks rise
-
Musk's X sues to block New York social media transparency law
-
Iran-Israel war: a lifeline for Netanyahu?
-
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation initiative 'outrageous': UN probe chief
-
India's Pant glad of Anderson and Broad exits ahead of England Tests
-
Moth uses stars to navigate long distances, scientists discover
-
Hurricane Erick approaches Mexico's Pacific coast
-
Gaza flotilla skipper vows to return
-
Netherlands returns over 100 Benin Bronzes looted from Nigeria
-
Nippon, US Steel say they have completed partnership deal
-
Almeida takes fourth stage of Tour of Switzerland with injured Thomas out
-
World champion Olga Carmona signs for PSG women's team
-
Putin T-shirts, robots and the Taliban -- but few Westerners at Russia's Davos
-
Trump on Iran strikes: 'I may do it, I may not do it'
-
Khamenei vows Iran will never surrender
-
Bangladesh tighten grip on first Sri Lanka Test
-
England's Pope keeps place for India series opener
-
Itoje to lead Lions for first time against Argentina
-
Oil rises, stocks mixed as investors watch rates, conflict
-
Iran-Israel war: latest developments
-
Iran threatens response if US crosses 'red line': ambassador
-
Iranians buying supplies in Iraq tell of fear, shortages back home
-
UK's Catherine, Princess of Wales, pulls out of Royal Ascot race meeting
-
Rape trial of France's feminist icon Pelicot retold on Vienna stage
-
Khamenei says Iran will 'never surrender', warns off US
-
Oil prices dip, stocks mixed tracking Mideast unrest
-
How Paris's Seine river keeps the Louvre cool in summer
-
Welshman Thomas out of Tour of Switzerland as 'precautionary measure'
-
UN says two Iran nuclear sites destroyed in Israel strikes
-
South Africans welcome home Test champions the Proteas
-
Middle Age rents live on in German social housing legacy
-
Israel targets nuclear site as Iran claims hypersonic missile attack
-
China's AliExpress risks fine for breaching EU illegal product rules
-
Liverpool face Bournemouth in Premier League opener, Man Utd host Arsenal
-
Heatstroke alerts issued in Japan as temperatures surge
-
Liverpool to kick off Premier League title defence against Bournemouth
-
Meta offered $100 mn bonuses to poach OpenAI employees: CEO Altman
-
Spain pushes back against mooted 5% NATO spending goal
-
UK inflation dips less than expected in May
-
Oil edges down, stocks mixed but Mideast war fears elevated
-
Energy transition: how coal mines could go solar
-
Australian mushroom murder suspect not on trial for lying: defence
-
New Zealand approves medicinal use of 'magic mushrooms'
-
Suspects in Bali murder all Australian, face death penalty: police
-
Taiwan's entrepreneurs in China feel heat from cross-Strait tensions
China, Trump, and the power of war?
As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.
Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions
Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.
Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.
Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.
The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response
Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.
Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.
Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.
Potential Military Scenarios
Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.
Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.
Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.
Risks and Global Ramifications
Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.
Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.
International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.
Diplomatic Alternatives
Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.
Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.
In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.

What is currently delaying Sweden's accession to NATO?

NASA UFO investigation team holds meeting before final report

Ukraine's fight against the terrorist state of Russia

Hilton Dubai Palm Jumeirah in Dubai receives the AUBERGE AWARD 2023 from BERLINER TAGEZEITUNG

Talks between Sudan's warring parties underway in Jeddah

Arab League reinstates Syrian membership after a 12-year suspension

Turkey's President Erdogan shows supporters he is ready for a fight

Ukraine-War: Warfare's brave new world enters a military moral maze

Пригожин, тупая русская свинья, испугался в Бахмуте!

LIVE TRANSMISSION LONDON: Coronation King Charles III.

Три тупые свиньи: Пригожин, Шойгу и Путин!
