-
Rosenior says Chelsea owners supportive despite slump
-
Oil jumps on Hormuz tensions, stocks retreat
-
Romania legend Hagi eyes 'winning every game' on return as coach
-
Rana stars as Bangladesh down New Zealand to level ODI series at 1-1
-
Real Madrid coach Arbeloa launches stout defence of Mbappe
-
Pope Leo blasts 'exploitation' on visit to resource-rich Angola
-
Amy Winehouse's father loses suit against friends selling her clothes
-
Japan issues warning after 7.7-magnitude quake hits north
-
UniCredit woos Commerzbank shareholders in takeover battle
-
European stocks slide as oil jumps on Hormuz tensions
-
Amy Winehouse's dad loses suit against friends for selling clothes
-
Slovenian liberal Golob fails to form government
-
Elon Musk summoned over French X deepfake probe but presence unclear
-
Tsunami warning as major quake hits northern Japan, shakes Tokyo
-
Rana takes 5-32 as Bangladesh bowl out New Zealand for 198
-
Anthropic says will put AI risks 'on the table' with Mythos model
-
Iran says no plan for US peace talks
-
Iran executes two more members of exiled opposition: group
-
Pope Leo visits Angola's diamond-rich northeast
-
US begins 'biggest ever' Philippines war games in thick of Mideast conflict
-
Bulgaria ex-president wins parliamentary majority
-
Oil prices jump on Iran war escalation but stocks up on peace hope
-
US begins 'biggest ever' Philippines war games in thick of Mideast war
-
Anxiety lingers in divided Kashmir a year after shooting attack
-
Hit reality show helps rev up Japan's delinquent youth subculture
-
Magic shock Pistons as Thunder and Celtics win big in NBA playoffs
-
Oil prices bounce back on Iran war escalation
-
Residents return to ravaged homes months after Hong Kong fire
-
Australia's Green wins playoff for third LPGA LA Championship title
-
Pakistan's military chief takes lead on US-Iran talks in diplomatic blitz
-
Thunder, Celtics open NBA playoffs with big wins, Magic shock Pistons
-
US begins Philippines war games in thick of Middle East conflict
-
Who's Bad? Not Michael Jackson in new big-budget biopic
-
Nations gather for first-ever conference on fossil fuel exit
-
Money, lobbyists, inertia: why fossil fuels are so hard to quit
-
France summons Elon Musk over X probe
-
'Save humanity': Four figures battling it out to lead embattled UN
-
Gilgeous-Alexander, Wemby, Jokic finalists for NBA MVP
-
Israel vows to level homes in Lebanon, counter threats with 'full force'
-
GA-ASI Completes MQ-9B 'Flight Into Known Icing' Flight Tests
-
U.S. Polo Assn. Debuts Global Flagship at a Top Miami Destination
-
Rahm coasts to LIV Golf win in Mexico City
-
Fitzpatrick survives Scheffler playoff to win RBC Heritage
-
Thunder thrash Suns, Celtics crush Sixers in NBA playoff openers
-
Bulgaria's former president tops parliamentary vote
-
Kenyans Korir, Lokedi seek to repeat at Boston Marathon
-
AC Milan, Juventus close in on Champions League qualification
-
Spring double keeps Racing 92 in Top 14 play-off hunt with Paris derby win
-
Endrick stars as Lyon dent PSG's Ligue 1 title hopes
-
History haunts Arsenal as Man City take control of title race
Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?
The White House has said President Donald Trump is discussing options including military action to take Greenland -- despite a warning from Denmark that an attack would spell the end of NATO.
But how high really is the risk that Trump's desire for the territory might end up sinking an alliance that has underpinned Western security for over seven decades?
The answer depends on whether Trump is really planning to make a move and if the spectre of military force is just a bluff to exert pressure.
Here's how the situation could break down:
- US ups threats -
In the wake of his military intervention in Venezuela, Trump set off alarm bells in Europe by repeating his insistence that he wants to take control of Greenland.
The mineral-rich semi-autonomous territory -- part of Washington's long-standing NATO ally Denmark and home already to a US military base -- has been in Trump's sights since his first term in office.
But this time around his administration has ramped up its rhetoric by insisting that "acquiring Greenland is a national security priority".
"The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilising the US military is always an option," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday.
That came despite a warning from Danish premier Mette Frederiksen an attack on a NATO ally would end the alliance -- and a show of support for Copenhagen from key European leaders.
- Military route? -
While Trump was willing to deploy US military might against long-standing foe Venezuela, using force against a close ally like Denmark is a different ball game.
French President Emmanuel Macron said he couldn't "imagine a scenario" under which Washington would violate Danish sovereignty.
Any US military action against Greenland would effectively tear NATO apart.
Its Article Five pledge that members will defend each other if attacked is meant to deter threats from outside -- and the idea of its key power would turn on an ally was seen as inconceivable.
Under an existing agreement with Denmark, the United States could already station more troops Greenland if it wants.
Officials at NATO have repeatedly played down the prospect Trump could invade -- but admit that with the US leader they can never be sure.
"We don't believe he would -- there is no need -- the US can get any access they want from Denmark," a senior NATO diplomat told AFP, speaking as others on condition of anonymity.
"But given the persistent rhetoric, we can't be entirely sure."
So far there has been no sign of the sort of military buildup witnessed around Venezuela and some US officials have been pressing other options.
US media reported Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers Trump wants to buy Greenland rather than attack it -- and the hope from NATO is that diplomacy will win out.
"I hope the Danes, the Greenlanders and the Americans will sit around a fire somewhere and an outcome will be reached," a second NATO diplomat said.
- NATO steers clear -
So far NATO as an organisation has tried to stay out of the Greenland issue.
"I don't think this issue will ever be brought up in a NATO framework in order to avoid any divisions," a third NATO diplomat said.
With Russia's war raging in Ukraine, European members are desperate not to jeopardise US involvement in helping to shield them from Moscow.
Alliance chief Mark Rutte has tried to deflect US interest by emphasising joint efforts to bolster security in the Arctic against threats from Russia and China, a key justification by Trump for wanting Greenland.
"The Danes are totally fine if the US would have a bigger presence than they have now," Rutte told CNN. "We have to make sure that the Arctic stays safe."
While the alliance takes a backseat, some more bullish European members may try to be more assertive.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said Paris was talking to Germany and Poland to come up with a plan for a possible response.
There are fears though that just by raising the prospect of attacking an ally -- or pressuring it to cede territory -- the United States may have already damaged NATO.
"No one has any interest in a quarrel within NATO, except our enemies," said Belgian defence minister Theo Francken.
"I'm convinced initiatives will be taken in the coming days, behind the scenes or in the open, to resolve this situation."
Z.AlNajjar--SF-PST