-
German exports to US plunge as tariffs exact heavy cost
-
Portugal heads for presidential vote, fretting over storms and far-right
-
Suicide blast at Islamabad mosque kills at least 30, wounds over 130: police
-
Russia says Kyiv behind Moscow shooting of army general
-
Greenland villagers focus on 'normal life' amid stress of US threat
-
Iran, US hold talks in Oman after Trump military threats
-
Stocks waver as tech worries build
-
Dupont, Jalibert click to give France extra spark in Six Nations bid
-
'Excited' Scots out to prove they deserve T20 World Cup call-up
-
EU tells TikTok to change 'addictive' design
-
India captain admits 'there will be nerves' at home T20 World Cup
-
Stellantis takes massive hit for 'overestimation' of EV shift
-
'Mona's Eyes': how an obscure French art historian swept the globe
-
Iran, US hold talks in Oman
-
Iran, US hold talks in Oman after deadly protest crackdown
-
In Finland's forests, soldiers re-learn how to lay anti-personnel mines
-
Israeli president visits Australia after Bondi Beach attack
-
In Dakar fishing village, surfing entices girls back to school
-
Lakers rally to beat Sixers despite Doncic injury
-
Russian pensioners turn to soup kitchen as war economy stutters
-
Japan taps Meta to help search for abuse of Olympic athletes
-
As Estonia schools phase out Russian, many families struggle
-
Toyota names new CEO, hikes profit forecasts
-
Next in Putin's sights? Estonia town stuck between two worlds
-
Family of US news anchor's missing mother renews plea to kidnappers
-
Spin woes, injury and poor form dog Australia for T20 World Cup
-
Japan's Liberal Democratic Party: an election bulldozer
-
Hazlewood out of T20 World Cup in fresh blow to Australia
-
Japan scouring social media 24 hours a day for abuse of Olympic athletes
-
Bangladesh Islamist leader seeks power in post-uprising vote
-
Rams' Stafford named NFL's Most Valuable Player
-
Japan to restart world's biggest nuclear plant
-
Japan's Sanae Takaichi: Iron Lady 2.0 hopes for election boost
-
Italy set for 2026 Winter Olympics opening ceremony
-
Hong Kong to sentence media mogul Jimmy Lai on Monday
-
Pressure on Townsend as Scots face Italy in Six Nations
-
Taiwan's political standoff stalls $40 bn defence plan
-
Inter eyeing chance to put pressure on title rivals Milan
-
Arbeloa's Real Madrid seeking consistency over magic
-
Dortmund dare to dream as Bayern's title march falters
-
PSG brace for tough run as 'strange' Marseille come to town
-
Japan PM wins Trump backing ahead of snap election
-
AI tools fabricate Epstein images 'in seconds,' study says
-
Asian markets extend global retreat as tech worries build
-
Sells like teen spirit? Cobain's 'Nevermind' guitar up for sale
-
Thailand votes after three prime ministers in two years
-
UK royal finances in spotlight after Andrew's downfall
-
Diplomatic shift and elections see Armenia battle Russian disinformation
-
Undercover probe finds Australian pubs short-pouring beer
-
Epstein fallout triggers resignations, probes
Brazil high court resumes key Indigenous lands case
Brazil's Supreme Court resumed hearings Wednesday in a closely watched case on whether to restrict native peoples' rights to claim their ancestral lands, a key buffer against climate change.
Hundreds of Indigenous protesters, many in traditional feather headdresses, rallied in the capital Brasilia as the court weighed the legality of the so-called "time-frame argument," which holds that native peoples should not have the right to lands where they were not present in 1988, when the current constitution was ratified.
Indigenous groups say that violates their rights, given that many were forced from their ancestral lands, including during the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from the 1960s to 1980s.
The Supreme Court began hearing the case in 2021, but has adjourned the proceedings several times.
So far, two of the court's 11 justices have sided with the Indigenous plaintiffs, and two against them, one of these a judge who announced his stance on Wednesday.
The proceedings were to resume on Thursday with the remaining seven judges due to state their opinion.
Climate campaigners have joined Indigenous activists in pressing for the court to reject the time-frame argument, given that numerous studies have found that protected Indigenous reservations are one of the best ways to fight deforestation and, with it, global warming.
"The argument ignores our constitutional rights to our ancestral lands, puts existing Indigenous reservations at risk and makes creating new ones unviable," Dinamam Tuxa, coordinator of the Association of Brazil's Indigenous Peoples (APIB), told AFP ahead of the trial.
Indigenous rights groups have dubbed the case the "trial of the century."
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a statement that a win for the time-frame limitation argument would be "a big setback" for the rights of Indigenous people in Brazil and go against international human rights norms.
The limitation is backed by Brazil's powerful agribusiness lobby, which scored a victory in May when the lower house of Congress passed a bill enshrining the 1988 cutoff in law.
The bill is now working its way through the Senate.
Leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, a self-described ally of Indigenous peoples, is expected to veto the bill if it passes. But Congress, where the agribusiness coalition is a major player, could override a veto.
The case could enter murky legal territory if that happens before the Supreme Court's justices finish delivering their rulings.
The constitution makes no mention of a cutoff date in relation to Indigenous reservations.
Indigenous reservations cover 11.6 percent of Brazil's territory, notably in the Amazon rainforest.
Brazil has around 1.7 million Indigenous inhabitants -- 0.8 percent of the population.
Y.Shaath--SF-PST