-
OpenAI cancels release of newest model due to safety concerns
-
Manchester City's Premier League charges: What comes next?
-
AI bosses head to White House as safety pressure builds
-
Brazil's cellphone crime: a security nightmare in every pocket
-
Batista sacked as Costa Rica coach after six months
-
Russia pummels Kyiv in latest deadly attack
-
Flooding, power cuts and evacuations as Hurricane Polo slams Mexico
-
NFL Giants obtain QB McCarthy from Vikings
-
Dodgers eye three-peat, Red Sox face Yankees as MLB playoffs begin
-
Deal for evicted Spanish pensioner as PM seeks new housing law
-
Certification of Boeing 737 MAX delayed by software bug
-
Clippers apologize, warn fans of 'challenges' after Leonard scandal
-
Celine Dion wows Paris Fashion Week with surprise gig
-
Turkish comedian convicted for Erdogan 'insult' freed pending appeal
-
AMD buys firm founded by AI 'godmother' Fei-Fei Li
-
Trump announces 'biggest' US steel plant in battleground Iowa
-
Italy rebound in Turkey as France win late in Belgium
-
Olise wonder strike gives Zidane's France win in Belgium
-
Pope says concerns about AI 'should be taken seriously'
-
US stocks fall, bond yields rise as Middle East war drags on
-
Hurricanes to hoist title banner as NHL season begins
-
Trump denies offering to sell arms to China's Xi
-
Justice Alito steps aside from major US climate case
-
Wemby ready for NBA Spurs to move rivals in climb to top
-
Willis happy with England exile after retains Top 14 player award
-
Ukraine to postpone some spending amid delays in aid: PM
-
Spain housing protests keep heat on government as PM seeks new law
-
Tuchel says Czech Republic game 'not yet a must-win'
-
Wissa spoils Zimbabwe homecoming as DR Congo win AFCON qualifier
-
MaXhosa puts South Africa on the Paris fashion map
-
UK police release on bail five men held over airbase incident
-
Rose, Scott among 2027 World Golf Hall of Fame finalists
-
Ex-All Black Plummer 'sure' New Zealand will find Super Rugby solution
-
Brunson says NBA champion Knicks can't get satisfaction
-
Shein sees 1% revenue growth in first half of 2026
-
France puts out largest wildfire since 1949
-
Netherlands regrets Israel retaliation in settlements row
-
Real Madrid's Perez summoned over Barcelona referee payments comments
-
Moscow seizes Russian assets of German food retailer Metro
-
Oil takes off again, Wall Street dips after Trump rejects Iran truce offer
-
Bulgarian spirits inflamed by new rakia rules
-
AlgoQuant Asset Management Selects Liquid Mercury to Enhance Digital Asset Trading Infrastructure
-
Documentary turns camera on architect Peter Zumthor
-
UK to reopen refugee resettlement scheme to push 'safe' migration
-
UK police say releasing on bail five men held over airbase incident
-
Pope urges Europe to help combat 'lies and deceit' in world affairs
-
Trump admin finalizes reversal of US fuel economy standards
-
Iranian lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh wins Council of Europe's rights prize
-
US says no China arms sale plans after envoy cites Trump offer
-
French far-right's Bardella denies alleged 2013 antisemitic comments
Brazil high court resumes key Indigenous lands case
Brazil's Supreme Court resumed hearings Wednesday in a closely watched case on whether to restrict native peoples' rights to claim their ancestral lands, a key buffer against climate change.
Hundreds of Indigenous protesters, many in traditional feather headdresses, rallied in the capital Brasilia as the court weighed the legality of the so-called "time-frame argument," which holds that native peoples should not have the right to lands where they were not present in 1988, when the current constitution was ratified.
Indigenous groups say that violates their rights, given that many were forced from their ancestral lands, including during the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from the 1960s to 1980s.
The Supreme Court began hearing the case in 2021, but has adjourned the proceedings several times.
So far, two of the court's 11 justices have sided with the Indigenous plaintiffs, and two against them, one of these a judge who announced his stance on Wednesday.
The proceedings were to resume on Thursday with the remaining seven judges due to state their opinion.
Climate campaigners have joined Indigenous activists in pressing for the court to reject the time-frame argument, given that numerous studies have found that protected Indigenous reservations are one of the best ways to fight deforestation and, with it, global warming.
"The argument ignores our constitutional rights to our ancestral lands, puts existing Indigenous reservations at risk and makes creating new ones unviable," Dinamam Tuxa, coordinator of the Association of Brazil's Indigenous Peoples (APIB), told AFP ahead of the trial.
Indigenous rights groups have dubbed the case the "trial of the century."
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a statement that a win for the time-frame limitation argument would be "a big setback" for the rights of Indigenous people in Brazil and go against international human rights norms.
The limitation is backed by Brazil's powerful agribusiness lobby, which scored a victory in May when the lower house of Congress passed a bill enshrining the 1988 cutoff in law.
The bill is now working its way through the Senate.
Leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, a self-described ally of Indigenous peoples, is expected to veto the bill if it passes. But Congress, where the agribusiness coalition is a major player, could override a veto.
The case could enter murky legal territory if that happens before the Supreme Court's justices finish delivering their rulings.
The constitution makes no mention of a cutoff date in relation to Indigenous reservations.
Indigenous reservations cover 11.6 percent of Brazil's territory, notably in the Amazon rainforest.
Brazil has around 1.7 million Indigenous inhabitants -- 0.8 percent of the population.
Y.Shaath--SF-PST