
-
Bank of Japan holds rates, says to slow bond purchase taper
-
Empty seats as Chelsea win opener at Club World Cup, Benfica deny Boca
-
G7 urges Iran de-escalation as Trump makes hasty summit exit
-
Verdict due for Sweden's 'Queen of Trash' over toxic waste
-
Israel, Iran trade missile fire as Trump warns Tehran to 'evacuate'
-
Thunder hold off Pacers to take 3-2 NBA Finals lead
-
Soft power: BTS fans rally behind Korean international adoptees
-
Dominant Flamengo open with victory at Club World Cup
-
Oil prices jump after Trump's warning, stocks extend gains
-
UK MPs eye decriminalising abortion for women in all cases
-
Yen slides ahead of Bank of Japan policy decision
-
Ecuador pipeline burst stops flow of crude
-
China's Xi in Kazakhstan to cement Central Asia ties
-
Despite law, US TikTok ban likely to remain on hold
-
Venezuela's El Dorado, where gold is currency of the poor
-
US forces still in 'defensive posture' in Mideast: White House
-
Trump makes hasty summit exit over Iran crisis
-
OpenAI wins $200 mn contract with US military
-
AFP photographer shot in face with rubber bullet at LA protest
-
Boca denied by two Argentines as Benfica fight back
-
Rise in 'harmful content' since Meta policy rollbacks: survey
-
Trump to leave G7 early after warning of Iran attack
-
'Strange' to play in front of 50,000 empty seats: Chelsea's Maresca
-
Netanyahu says 'changing face of Middle East' as Israel, Iran trade blows
-
Mexican band accused of glorifying cartels changes its tune
-
G7 leaders urge Trump to ease off trade war
-
Trump presses Iran to talk but holds back on joint G7 call
-
Colombia presidential hopeful 'critical' after shooting
-
Main doctor charged in actor Matthew Perry overdose to plead guilty
-
Chelsea defeat LAFC in poorly-attended Club World Cup opener
-
Tiafoe crashes out, Rune cruises through at Queen's Club
-
Netanyahu says campaign 'changing face of Middle East' as Israel, Iran trade blows
-
What's not being discussed at G7 as Trump shapes agenda
-
UK apologises to thousands of grooming victims as it toughens law
-
Iran state TV briefly knocked off air by strike after missiles kill 11 in Israel
-
Trump urges Iran to talk as G7 looks for common ground
-
Canada wildfire near Vancouver contained
-
Four Atletico ultras get suspended jail for Vinicius effigy
-
England's top women's league to expand to 14 teams
-
Oil prices drop, stocks climb as Iran-Israel war fears ease
-
UN refugee agency says will shed 3,500 jobs due to funding cuts
-
US moves to protect all species of pangolin, world's most trafficked mammal
-
Kneecap 'unfazed' by legal problems, says friend and director
-
Electric fences, drones, dogs protect G7 leaders from bear attack
-
The name's Metreweli... Who is UK MI6's first woman chief?
-
Oil prices fall, stocks rise as Iran-Israel war fears ease
-
Fighter jets, refuelling aircraft, frigate: UK assets in Mideast
-
Iranian Nobel laureates, Cannes winner urge halt to Iran-Israel conflict
-
Struggling Gucci owner's shares soar over new CEO reports
-
Khamenei, Iran's political survivor, faces ultimate test

UK court hears latest Prince Harry libel suit against newspaper
A libel lawsuit brought by Prince Harry against one of Britain's biggest newspaper groups had its first court date Thursday in the latest legal action taken by the US-based royal.
The Duke of Sussex is suing Associated Newspapers -- which publishes the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday and MailOnline -- over an article alleging he had sought to keep a request for British police protection under wraps.
The lawsuit relates to coverage in the Mail on Sunday and online of a separate court challenge he is pursuing against the UK government over his security arrangements when he is in Britain.
Harry, 37, and his wife Meghan Markle, 40, live in California after stepping down from royal duties in 2019, which caused them to lose their UK taxpayer-paid protection.
The prince's lawyer, Justin Rushbrooke, told the High Court in a written submission that the February article was "defamatory" because it suggested Harry had "lied" and "improperly and cynically" tried to manipulate public opinion over the issue.
Associated Newspapers' legal team is disputing that there was "any meaning defamatory" of him in its coverage.
In the legal claim against the government, the duke has appealed to the High Court for a review of the interior ministry's refusal to allow him to pay for police protection himself, arguing the decision means he cannot return home safely.
The government has dismissed the offer to pay for police protection as "irrelevant," writing to the court earlier this year that personal "security by the police is not available on a privately financed basis".
The cases come after the royal couple launched legal action in recent years against a number of publications, alleging invasion of privacy.
Markle won a long-running case against Associated Newspapers last year over the publication of a letter she wrote to her estranged father.
Judge Matthew Nicklin, who is hearing the new libel claim, will rule on a number of preliminary issues that he is considering following Thursday's hearing.
A.Suleiman--SF-PST