-
Barca edge Celta but lose match-winner Yamal to injury
-
UK, France agree three-year deal to stop migrant crossings
-
Trump looks for way out on war, but Iran may not oblige
-
Tears and smiles at tribute concert for Swiss fire victims
-
Tesla reports higher profits, topping estimates
-
Manchester City go top of Premier League as Burnley relegated
-
Kane and Diaz send Bayern past Leverkusen into German Cup final
-
Concert pays tribute to Swiss fire disaster victims
-
US stocks rise, shrugging off uncertain ceasefire prospects while oil prices jump
-
Pope hits out at jails in closed-off Equatorial Guinea
-
Atletico beaten again in Elche thriller
-
England rugby great Moody offered 'hope' in battle with motor neurone disease
-
PSG roll over Nantes to move closer to Ligue 1 title
-
Ecuador doctors protest crisis as patients bring own meds to surgery
-
Top Peru ministers quit in protest over stalled US fighter jet deal
-
De La Hoya and Ali's grandson slam proposed federal boxing reform
-
Archer, Burger turn up the heat as Rajasthan beat Lucknow in IPL
-
Trump alleges Democratic-backed Virginia referendum was 'rigged'
-
Archer, Burger help Rajasthan beat Lucknow in IPL
-
Migrants deported from US stranded, 'scared' in DR Congo
-
Raiders expected to make Mendoza first pick in NFL Draft
-
Chelsea sack Rosenior after worst run since 1912
-
Veteran Fijian Botia extends La Rochelle contract to 2027
-
Colombia's ambitious energy transition gets reality check
-
Liam Rosenior sacked as Chelsea manager
-
'Seriously fractured'? Scepticism over Trump's Iran leadership split claim
-
US doesn't dictate terms of trade talks: Carney
-
Mideast war weighs on parent of Durex condoms
-
Greek parliament lifts immunity of MPs probed in EU farm scandal
-
Just a little late: Frankfurt celebrates new airport terminal
-
Germany forward Gnabry confirms he will miss World Cup
-
Liam Rosenior sacked as Chelsea manager: club
-
Shifting goals blur picture of US blockade on Iran
-
US Treasury chief defends pivot to extend Russia oil sanctions relief
-
French teenager Seixas becomes youngest Fleche Wallonne winner
-
New drugs raise hopes of pancreatic cancer breakthrough
-
South Africa coal delay could cause 32,000 deaths, report says
-
French teenager Seixas becomes youngest winner of La Fleche Wallonne
-
Hezbollah supporters defiant after sons killed fighting Israel
-
EU unblocks 90-bn-euro Ukraine loan after Hungary row
-
Russia says will halt flow of Kazakh oil to Germany
-
Merz says climate policy must not 'endanger' German industry
-
Ziggy Stardust lives on at David Bowie London immersive
-
Thousands of London commuters walk to work in underground strike
-
Boeing reports narrowing loss, points to progress on turnaround
-
Oil up, stocks mixed on uncertain prospects for US-Iran ceasefire
-
Germany halves 2026 growth forecast on Iran war fallout
-
Chinese EVs look to sideline foreign brands at Beijing auto show
-
Russia to block flow of Kazakh oil to German refinery, Berlin says
-
Vietnam, South Korea sign deals on tech, nuclear power
All hormonal contraceptives increase breast cancer risk: study
All hormonal contraceptives carry a slightly increased risk of breast cancer, including the increasingly popular progestogen-only pills, according to a study published on Tuesday.
The researchers who carried out the study stressed that the increased risk of breast cancer needs to be weighed against the benefits of hormonal contraceptives, including the protection they provide against other forms of female cancer.
Previous studies have established an increased risk of breast cancer from two-hormone, or combined, contraceptives that use both estrogen and progestogen.
While the use of progestogen-only contraceptives has been on the rise for well over a decade, little research had been performed previously on their links to breast cancer.
The study, published in the journal PLOS Medicine, found that the risk of a woman developing breast cancer was about the same for hormonal contraceptives using both estrogen and progestogen as for those using just progestogen.
According to the study, women taking hormonal contraceptives have a 20 to 30 percent higher risk of developing breast cancer than those who do not use them.
The findings are similar to those published previously, including in a vast 1996 study.
The risk remains about the same regardless of the delivery method -- oral pill, IUD, implant or injection -- or whether it is a combined pill or progestogen alone.
Taking into account that the likelihood of breast cancer increases with age, the authors of the study calculated how much absolute excess risk is associated with hormonal contraceptives.
For women taking hormonal contraceptives for a period of five years between the ages of 16 to 20, it represented eight cases of breast cancer per 100,000, they said.
Between 35 and 39 years old, it was 265 cases per 100,000.
- 'Very small increase in absolute risk' -
"Nobody wants to hear that something that they're taking is going to increase their risk of breast cancer by 25 percent," said Gillian Reeves, a professor of statistical epidemiology at the University of Oxford and a co-author of the study.
"What we're talking about here is very small increase in absolute risk," Reeves said.
"These increases in risk for breast cancer have to, of course, be viewed in the context of what we know about the many benefits of taking hormonal contraceptives," she added.
"Not just in terms of birth control, but also because we know that oral contraceptives actually provide quite substantial and long term protection from other female cancers, such as ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer."
The study also confirmed, like others, that the risk of breast cancer declines in the years after a woman stops using hormonal contraceptives.
Stephen Duffy, a professor at Queen Mary University of London who did not take part in the study, described the findings as "reassuring in that the effect is modest."
The study involved data from nearly 10,000 women under the age of 50 who developed breast cancer between 1996 and 2017 in the United Kingdom, where the use of progestogen-only contraceptives is now as widespread as the combined method.
Reeves said there were several explanations for the growing use of progestogen-only contraceptives.
They are recommended for women who are breast-feeding, who may be at risk of cardiovascular problems or smokers above the age of 35.
"It might just be because women are taking hormonal contraceptives possibly into later years now," Reeves said.
"So they are naturally at higher risk of those other conditions for which risk is increased with combined contraceptives."
S.Abdullah--SF-PST