-
Oil extends gains after fresh US strikes
-
Turn off addictive features on social media for children, say EU lawmakers
-
EU population to peak in 2029 before long-term decline
-
Bumrah returns for India as England bat in 1st ODI
-
Fire ravages historic forest outside Paris
-
US strikes Iran, vows to reimpose naval blockade
-
57 gored or bruised during Spain's San Fermin bull runs
-
Oil extends gains after fresh US strikes, stocks mostly rise
-
Wildfires advance in forest south of Paris
-
Families claim bodies as Bangkok fire toll rises to 30
-
Ukrainian men in Poland face legal limbo
-
Egg-free school meals scramble politics in India
-
Wildlife rescuers help birds survive Pakistan's hotter summers
-
US strikes Iran for third day, will reimpose blockade
-
Messi meets England at last with World Cup final place on the line
-
Italy's Cannone gets four-match ban for red card against All Blacks
-
Oil extends gains after latest US strikes, tech suffers more losses
-
Co-star says Sam Neill battled pneumonia before death
-
Young Australian men falling victim to online sexual extortion: regulator
-
Armenian apricots become geopolitical battleground with Russia
-
New era for Gibraltar as border controls with Spain set to end
-
Jay-Z pays tribute to NY hometown crowd and his 30-year legacy
-
England face might of Messi's Argentina in World Cup semi-final
-
Birthday boy Yamal stands by 'no fear' comment ahead of France clash
-
Spain to go on 'front foot' against France in World Cup semi: De la Fuente
-
U.S. Polo Assn. Returns to 2026 DMMI Royal Charity Polo Cup as Official Apparel and Team Sponsor
-
Trump slashes two Utah protected areas by more than 90%
-
US strikes Iran for third night as Trump says deal still 'possible'
-
Spain 'favourites' says Deschamps ahead of World Cup semi-final showdown
-
Trump vows to hit Iran 'hard,' impose Hormuz transit fees
-
Norway receive heroes' welcome in Oslo after World Cup exit
-
France and Spain prepare to duel at World Cup
-
Pickford backs England to keep cool in tense Argentina World Cup semi
-
Five Britons among foreign Spanish wildfire victims
-
Oil prices surge on US-Iran attacks; tech shares fall
-
Ukraine allies pledge more air defence, pressure Russia
-
Thomas Tuchel: England's World Cup mastermind
-
'Until the end': The tireless, traumatic search for Venezuela quake victims
-
Mbappe paradox stirs club v country debate as France face Spain
-
Trump expected to shrink protected lands in Utah: reports
-
Trump reimposes Iran naval blockade, threatens Hormuz fees
-
Twelve US states sue to block Paramount's Warner Bros. takeover
-
US vows campaign to end ICC 'threat' to Americans
-
New boss Alonso calls for Chelsea 'hunger', wants Fernandez to stay
-
Yemen govt says hit Sanaa airport, Houthis attack Saudi Arabia
-
Knight excited for future after England career ends in India defeat
-
US judge voids 'improper' Trump tax deal
-
From bombmaking to motorcycle tweaks: how Nigerian jihadists use AI
-
US appeals court revives private cases alleging Tylenol link to autism
-
Edwards vows to 'upskill' England women for Ashes after India defeat
All hormonal contraceptives increase breast cancer risk: study
All hormonal contraceptives carry a slightly increased risk of breast cancer, including the increasingly popular progestogen-only pills, according to a study published on Tuesday.
The researchers who carried out the study stressed that the increased risk of breast cancer needs to be weighed against the benefits of hormonal contraceptives, including the protection they provide against other forms of female cancer.
Previous studies have established an increased risk of breast cancer from two-hormone, or combined, contraceptives that use both estrogen and progestogen.
While the use of progestogen-only contraceptives has been on the rise for well over a decade, little research had been performed previously on their links to breast cancer.
The study, published in the journal PLOS Medicine, found that the risk of a woman developing breast cancer was about the same for hormonal contraceptives using both estrogen and progestogen as for those using just progestogen.
According to the study, women taking hormonal contraceptives have a 20 to 30 percent higher risk of developing breast cancer than those who do not use them.
The findings are similar to those published previously, including in a vast 1996 study.
The risk remains about the same regardless of the delivery method -- oral pill, IUD, implant or injection -- or whether it is a combined pill or progestogen alone.
Taking into account that the likelihood of breast cancer increases with age, the authors of the study calculated how much absolute excess risk is associated with hormonal contraceptives.
For women taking hormonal contraceptives for a period of five years between the ages of 16 to 20, it represented eight cases of breast cancer per 100,000, they said.
Between 35 and 39 years old, it was 265 cases per 100,000.
- 'Very small increase in absolute risk' -
"Nobody wants to hear that something that they're taking is going to increase their risk of breast cancer by 25 percent," said Gillian Reeves, a professor of statistical epidemiology at the University of Oxford and a co-author of the study.
"What we're talking about here is very small increase in absolute risk," Reeves said.
"These increases in risk for breast cancer have to, of course, be viewed in the context of what we know about the many benefits of taking hormonal contraceptives," she added.
"Not just in terms of birth control, but also because we know that oral contraceptives actually provide quite substantial and long term protection from other female cancers, such as ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer."
The study also confirmed, like others, that the risk of breast cancer declines in the years after a woman stops using hormonal contraceptives.
Stephen Duffy, a professor at Queen Mary University of London who did not take part in the study, described the findings as "reassuring in that the effect is modest."
The study involved data from nearly 10,000 women under the age of 50 who developed breast cancer between 1996 and 2017 in the United Kingdom, where the use of progestogen-only contraceptives is now as widespread as the combined method.
Reeves said there were several explanations for the growing use of progestogen-only contraceptives.
They are recommended for women who are breast-feeding, who may be at risk of cardiovascular problems or smokers above the age of 35.
"It might just be because women are taking hormonal contraceptives possibly into later years now," Reeves said.
"So they are naturally at higher risk of those other conditions for which risk is increased with combined contraceptives."
S.Abdullah--SF-PST