-
Macron warns urgent to strike EU budget deal before French vote runup
-
Argentine protesters, police clash at demo over university funding
-
Zelensky rallies European allies as Trump ties slump
-
US stocks end higher as AI shares stabilize
-
Guardians edge Rays to seize MLB playoff series lead
-
School roof collapse kills 32 children, teacher in Pakistan
-
Trump scraps plan to livestream execution after fierce backlash
-
Lyon down Palace in Europa League, Sunderland leave it late
-
Martinez apologises for outburst at Man Utd hierarchy
-
UniCredit says receives ECB green light for Commerzbank takeover
-
Houthis launch deadly attack on presidential palace in Yemen's Aden
-
New York City pension fund asks Anthropic to delay IPO
-
Brazil forward Antony says home burgled during Betis match
-
Venezuela's Maduro denies US torture charges as 'false accusations'
-
Ravens face familiar foe in Browns coach Monken
-
Somalia sets May presidential election despite insecurity
-
France, Germany reach deal on future of car industry
-
Chelsea's Caicedo eager to be more of a leader
-
Carney campaigns for Canadian unity before Alberta secession vote
-
Rahm reaches separation deal with LIV in bankruptcy court
-
ATP proposes rankings system changes, extra player bonuses
-
UN chief urges nations to end 'war on nature'
-
Russell Brand was 'monster-like', alleged victim tells UK court
-
Newcastle boss Jaissle says Fernandez-Pardo just needs a goal
-
Crowded Launches Crowded MCP, Bringing Nonprofit Financial Operations Into ChatGPT and Claude
-
Infantino offers apology but 'no answers' at FIFA meeting over World Cup plan
-
Albanian PM condemns 'chaos' as violent unrest spreads
-
Don't exclude Turkey from 'Made in Europe' plan: minister to AFP
-
Italian football suffers new blow with Champions League misery
-
French duo Justice to score 'GTA VI': game maker
-
Trump scraps plan to livestream execution after broad backlash
-
El Nino a 'terrifying' threat to coral reefs: UN biodiversity expert
-
Seven missing off Romania after latest Black Sea drone attacks
-
Barcola must get used to Liverpool highs and lows, says Iraola
-
ARKBRIDGE Outlines Jonathan Morelli’s “Picks and Shovels” AI Infrastructure Investment Strategy
-
Versus Trade Wins Best ECN/STP Broker APAC 2026, Marking Third UF Awards Recognition
-
Tech sell-off rolls on as hot inflation data stokes rate worries
-
Three dead as Istanbul sees heaviest rainfall in 80 years
-
McIlroy makes 'solid' start in rain-hit Delhi as Norgaard leads
-
US producer prices see biggest jump since 2022 in added challenge to Trump
-
Seven missing after fire on vessel in Black Sea off Romania
-
Swiatek avoids seed exodus to breeze into Wuhan last eight
-
'Severe drought' declared in parts of UK
-
PM condemns 'chaos' as violent protests grip Albania
-
IUX Announces New Web Client Portal Built for Enhanced Browser-Based Trading
-
'I couldn't breathe', Russell Brand's alleged rape victim says
-
School roof collapse kills teacher, 32 children in NW Pakistan
-
Pope's cancer operation already reshaping papacy
-
Inter skipper Martinez facing month out with thigh injury
-
Zverev cruises past De Minaur to reach Shanghai semi-finals
US Supreme Court says asylum seekers can be turned away before border
The US Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that migrants seeking to present an asylum claim can be turned away before they reach the US-Mexico border.
The policy, known as "metering," has not been in place since 2021, but President Donald Trump sought a ruling validating it as legal should it be reinstated.
The policy allowed US federal immigration agents on the Mexican side of the US-Mexico border to turn away potential asylum seekers before they reached US soil.
The Immigration and Nationality Act allows an "alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States" to apply for asylum.
A divided appeals court ruled in 2024 that this applies to potential asylum seekers at ports of entry "whichever side of the border they are standing on."
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to reject this interpretation and the conservative-dominated court did so in a 6-3 ruling.
The question before the Supreme Court was "whether an alien who is stopped on the Mexican side of the US-Mexico border 'arrives in the United States.'"
Justice Samuel Alito, in a majority opinion joined by the five other conservatives, said "an alien standing in Mexico does not 'arrive in the United States' by attempting, and failing, to set foot in this country.
"An alien 'arrives in the United States' only when he crosses the border," Alito said. "A person arrives in a destination when he enters within its area -- not before -- and that conclusion does not change because someone or something blocks entry."
Justice Sonia Sotomayor penned a dissent joined by the other two liberal justices.
"The Court's illogical interpretation is driven almost entirely by a fixation on a single word: 'in,'" Sotomayor wrote, and "blesses the Executive Branch's decision to slam the door shut on all who are fleeing persecution.
"The consequences of today's decision are predictable," she said. "More people will die. More people will attempt to cross the border illegally, and some will make it while others will not."
Trump campaigned for the White House on a promise to expel millions of undocumented migrants and has taken a number of actions since returning to the White House aimed at speeding up deportations and reducing border crossings.
The asylum case is one of a number of immigration-related cases the Supreme Court heard this term.
On Thursday, the top court backed a Trump administration move to strip deportation protections from some 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians living in the United States.
The Supreme Court is expected to rule next week on President Donald Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, which makes anyone born on US soil automatically a citizen.
H.Jarrar--SF-PST