-
Far-right victory in Germany draws protesters in Berlin
-
Zheng shocks Swiatek in another incredible US Open comeback
-
CapTLX Launches Institutional Gateway to U.S. Private Markets, Expanding Access to Structured Investment Opportunities
-
Andreeva survives in three sets against Potapova
-
Africa's richest man eyes continent's largest IPO
-
Alleged killers of Australian, US surfers go on trial in Mexico
-
Macron, SKorea leader warn at film summit of AI risks to creativity
-
King Charles classes Harry and Meghan as 'private citizens'
-
'Impressive' Alcaraz has Shelton in sights in US Open quarter-final
-
Bowling coach Noffke says Pakistan's off-field issues are nothing new
-
Noosha Aubel a krize v Postupimi: Jak dlouho je ještě možné tolerovat toto selhání vedení?
-
Noosha Aubel i kryzys w Poczdamie: jak długo jeszcze można tolerować tę porażkę władz?
-
Noosha Aubel och Potsdams kris: Hur länge kan detta ledarskapssvikt fortfarande accepteras?
-
Η Noosha Aubel και η κρίση του Πότσνταμ: Για πόσο ακόμα είναι ανεκτή αυτή η διαχειριστική αποτυχία;
-
ヌーシャ・オーベルとポツダムの危機:この指導力の欠如は、いつまで容認され続けるのか?
-
नूशा ऑबेल और पॉट्सडैम का संकट: नेतृत्व की इस विफलता को और कितना सहन किया जा सकता है?
-
努莎·奧貝爾與波茨坦的危機:這種領導失職還能容忍多久?
-
نوشا أوبيل وأزمة بوتسدام: إلى متى سيظل هذا الفشل القيادي مقبولاً؟
-
Нуша Аубель і криза в Потсдамі: як довго ще можна миритися з цією неспроможністю керівництва?
-
누샤 아우벨과 포츠담의 위기: 이러한 리더십 부재는 얼마나 더 용인될 수 있는가?
-
Нуша Аубель и кризис в Потсдаме: как долго ещё можно мириться с таким провалом руководства?
-
Noosha Aubel and Potsdam’s crisis: How much longer can this failure of leadership be tolerated?
-
England quick Archer in 'good place' after injuries
-
US envoy sees 'movement' toward three-way talks with Russia, Ukraine
-
Robots protest rampant AI in Poland
-
Thousands bid farewell to Bosnian Serb war criminal in Belgrade
-
Rare woman director in Venice sees industry backsliding on gender
-
EU chief announces 200-mn-euro investment package for Greenland
-
France, SKorea warn at film summit of AI risks to creativity
-
Lebanon says Israel conducts wave of deadly strikes
-
Z Traders Introduces New Funding Model Designed to Expand Opportunities in Trading
-
Cipheras Group - Apex AI Fund Deploys 290-Billion-Parameter Proprietary Large Language Model
-
Lebanon says 12 killed in strikes as Israel vows to 'remove threats'
-
Germany's Merz 'shocked' by far-right state win but vows to stay course
-
Volkswagen plant to be converted for Israeli defence group
-
UK finance minister Healey pledges strict fiscal discipline as budget looms
-
Israeli rubble-clearing in Gaza could erase 'atrocity crimes' evidence: UN expert
-
Mbappe embraces Ballon d'Or talk after historic World Cup exploits
-
Scorching summer pushes French wine harvest to new historic low
-
Tech firms rally, with eyes on US inflation update
-
Pietersen joins England coaching team ahead of World Cup
-
Jaguar Land Rover to cut 4,000 jobs as European car sector hits skids
-
Germany's triumphant far-right AfD aims fire at Merz
-
US average diesel price rises to record $5.90 a gallon: AAA
-
Fury claims Joshua bout is off, calls for Usyk trilogy
-
Dukascopy Bank Unveils AI-Powered Trading, 25,000+ Stock CFDs and a New Flagship E-Banking App
-
British family bids to row back against suicide taboo
-
Tech firms rally but Asian markets mixed, with eyes on US inflation
-
China's teenage 223cm basketball player 'just a little girl'
-
Nepal holds day of mourning as families pray missing still alive
Trump hails 'giant win' after top court curbs judges
US President Donald Trump said Friday he can now push through a raft of controversial policies after the Supreme Court handed him a "giant win" by curbing the ability of lone judges to block his powers nationwide.
In a 6-3 ruling stemming from Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, the court said nationwide injunctions issued by individual district court judges likely exceed their authority.
"This was a tremendous win," Trump told reporters in a hastily arranged press conference at the White House. "I want to just thank again the Supreme Court for this ruling."
Trump said he would now proceed with "so many policies" that had been "wrongly" blocked, including his bid to end birthright citizenship, and stopping funding for transgender people and "sanctuary cities" for migrants.
US Attorney General Pam Bondi, standing alongside Trump at the podium, said the ruling would stop "rogue judges striking down President Trump's policies across the entire nation."
Democrats swiftly blasted the decision, saying it would embolden Trump as he pushes the boundaries of presidential power in his second term.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer called it a "terrifying step toward authoritarianism."
Trump however rejected concerns about the concentration of power in the White House.
"This is really the opposite of that," Trump said. "This really brings back the Constitution."
Trump separately hailed a "great ruling" by the Supreme Court to let parents opt their children out of LGBTQ-themed lessons at public schools.
The Supreme Court did not rule on the constitutionality of Trump's executive order seeking to end automatic citizenship for children born on US soil.
But the broader decision on the scope of judicial rulings removes a big roadblock to Trump's often highly contested policy agenda and has far-reaching ramifications for the ability of the judiciary to rein in Trump or future US presidents.
Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship is just one of a number of his moves that have been blocked by judges around the country -- both Democratic and Republican appointees – since he took office in January.
Courts have, for example, blocked or slowed down his hardline immigration crackdown, firing of federal employees, efforts to end diversity programs and punitive actions against law firms and universities.
- 'No right is safe' -
Past presidents have also complained about national injunctions shackling their agenda, but such orders have sharply risen under Trump, who saw more in his first two months than Democrat Joe Biden did during his first three years in office.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee, authored the majority opinion joined by the other five conservative justices.
"Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch," wrote Barrett, who has previously been a frequent target of Trump loyalists over previous decisions that went against the president.
The Supreme Court's three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying "no right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates."
Trump's initial reaction to the ruling came in a post on Truth Social, welcomed it as a "GIANT WIN."
The case was ostensibly about Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship, which was deemed unconstitutional by courts in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state.
But it actually focused on whether a single federal district court judge has the right to issue a nationwide block to a presidential decree with a universal injunction.
The issue has become a rallying cry for Trump and his Republican allies, who accuse the judiciary of impeding his agenda against the will of voters.
Steven Schwinn, a law professor at the University of Illinois Chicago, told AFP that the court's ruling "sharply undermines the power of federal courts to rein in lawless actions by the government."
Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship decrees that children born to parents in the United States illegally or on temporary visas would not automatically become citizens.
Trump said that the policy "was meant for the babies of slaves," dating back to the US Civil War era in the mid 1800s.
F.AbuShamala--SF-PST