-
Venezuela's Maduro, wife hit with new US torture charges
-
Kyiv entering 'survival' mode amid Russian strikes surge: mayor tells AFP
-
Argentina friendlies no fairy tale for African footballers
-
Verdict due in Mexico trial over murders of Australia, US surfers
-
US suspending Microsoft from visa program: Vance
-
B2PRIME Welcomes Christina Barbash as Commercial Manager
-
Man City must 'stick together' during crisis, says Haaland
-
Russia forcing Kyiv into 'survival' mode before winter, mayor tells AFP
-
CAS opens hearing into Senegal AFCON title appeal
-
Closing arguments begin in Maradona death trial
-
UK police agree searches for ex-prince Andrew's homes 'unlawful': judge
-
UEFA president Ceferin to stand for re-election in 2027
-
After botched US execution, Christa Pike walking, mentally 'foggy': lawyer
-
Nearly 300,000 Nepalis at flood risk: study
-
'Stunned' Madrid mourns pensioner who sparked housing protests
-
Riyadh kindergarten hit by interception debris as Houthis say targeted airport
-
High school students turn out for new protests across France
-
Alex Bodi mizează, alături de CRIF, pe investiții transparente și pe prevenirea riguroasă a spălării banilor
-
Bid by Italy's Intesa bank to take over MPS gets boost
-
Gulf Labs, Part of Thailand’s $27 Billion GULF Group, Goes Live as an Injective Validator
-
Stablecoins Are Quietly Becoming Business Infrastructure, NOWPayments Data Shows
-
EU okay for winter despite 'historically low' gas stocks: operators
-
Oil surges, stocks sink as US reportedly eyes new Iran strikes
-
Rwanda to host F1 Grand Prix: sources close to both sides
-
Woman in botched US execution walking, mentally 'foggy': lawyer
-
EU top diplomat says bloc in favour of UN Lebanon peacekeepers' extension
-
Farhan hopes Pakistan's new combination takes off in Sri Lanka T20Is
-
Antonelli and Russell to run different Mercedes aero packages in Singapore
-
Teenager Andreeva seals China Open semi-final with Bartunkova
-
WTO hikes 2026 trade growth forecast on AI boom
-
Britain's Burnham says open to Germany joining warplane project
-
'I love that challenge': Hamilton prays for rain in Singapore
-
Kovac's tough love has Dortmund dreaming of title charge
-
G.Bissau moves towards postponement of December general election
-
China announces candidate for WHO chief
-
Verstappen out to settle 'unfinished business' at Singapore Grand Prix
-
South Korea test-fires its first homegrown hypersonic weapon: presidency
-
WhiteBIT Launches Bitcoin Lightning Network Support, Powered by Voltage
-
ONAR Advances Nasdaq Listing Preparation Following Advertise Purple Acquisition and Financing
-
Oil surges, stocks sink as US reportedly eyes fresh Iran strikes
-
Thailand opens extradition process for reporter sought by China
-
Anne Carson: modern takes on Greek classics
-
France struggles to wean social housing off gas
-
Canada's Anne Carson wins Nobel literature prize
-
Germany lifts GDP forecast as economy withstands Iran war
-
Ethiopia drones hit Eritrean troops in Tigray
-
Sri Lanka appoints Kusal Mendis as Test captain
-
Russian strike on buses kills 30 in frontline Ukrainian city
-
Norris confident McLaren can shine in Singapore
-
Thailand begins extradition process against Chinese journalist
UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance
Apple lost a UK lawsuit Thursday which accuses the US tech giant of abusing the dominant position of its App Store, with claimants seeking more than £1.5 billion ($2 billion) in damages.
The Competition Appeal Tribunal found that Apple shut out competition in the app distribution market and charged app developers "excessive and unfair" commissions.
Apple said it "strongly disagrees" with the ruling and intends to appeal.
The case was brought by King's College London academic Rachael Kent and the law firm Hausfeld & Co on behalf of millions of UK iPhone and iPad users.
Under UK law, in this type of class action, all potentially affected persons are included in the procedure by default, and may benefit from possible compensation, unless they voluntarily opt out.
In the trial, which opened in January, claimants argued that Apple users were overcharged by the company "due to its ban on rival app store platforms."
They said a 30-percent surcharge that the company "imposes" on apps purchased through Apple's App Store leads to consumers "paying more."
At the heart of the claimants' case was that Apple used the App Store to exclude competitors, forcing users to use its system and boosting profits in the process.
Apple, which had denounced the trial as "baseless", maintained that its App Store "faces vigorous competition from many other platforms."
C.AbuSway--SF-PST