-
Ships attacked in Gulf as Trump extends Iran ceasefire
-
Germany set to slash growth forecast due to Mideast war
-
Pakistan's capital holds its breath with US-Iran talks in limbo
-
Groundbreaking Iranian snooker star Vafaei takes on the world
-
Sakib Hussain: IPL quick whose mum sold her jewellery to fund cricket dream
-
US-based Buddhist monks bring peace walk to Sri Lanka
-
NASA unveils new space telescope to give 'atlas of the universe'
-
Trump extends ceasefire, claims Iran 'collapsing financially'
-
The tiny, defiant Nile island caught in the heart of Sudan's war
-
UK inflation jumps as Mideast war propels energy prices
-
Oil falls, stocks mixed as traders weigh outlook after Trump extends truce
-
Oil, stocks mixed as traders weigh outlook after Trump extends truce
-
Anthropic probes unauthorized access to Mythos AI model
-
Stadium that was symbol of NZ post-quake rebuild to hold first match
-
Blazers stun Spurs after Wemby injury, Lakers down Rockets
-
Chinese carmakers aim to build up presence in Europe
-
Maoist landmine legacy haunts India
-
Fiji villagers reject plan for 'Pacific ashtray' in beach paradise
-
India orders school water bells to beat heat
-
Japanese minnows one win from fairytale Champions League title
-
Rugby Australia eyes brighter future as Lions tour brings cash windfall
-
Blazers rally stuns Spurs after Wembanyama injury
-
Young Chinese use AI to launch one-person firms over job anxiety
-
Delicate extraction: Malaysia offers rare earths alternative to China
-
Oil, stocks fall as traders weigh outlook after Trump extends truce
-
Pope to visit prison on final leg of Africa tour
-
US military says key weapons system staying in South Korea
-
India strangles final Maoist bastion as mining looms
-
AI-powered robots offer new hope to German factories
-
Indonesia orangutan forest cleared for 'carbon-neutral' packaging firm
-
PGA Tour mulls pathway back for golfers as LIV plots survival
-
One month phone-free: Young Americans try digital detox
-
Questions about Tesla spending binge ahead of earnings
-
Rome summons Russian ambassador over insults against Meloni
-
US tells Afghans to choose Taliban home or DR Congo: activist
-
John Ternus to lead Apple in the age of AI
-
SpaceX partners with AI startup Cursor, may buy it for $60 bn
-
Mexico pyramid shooter inspired by Columbine attack, pre-Hispanic sacrifices
-
Mexico pyramid shooter planned attack, fixated on US massacre
-
Mbappe on the mark as Real Madrid sink Alaves
-
Rosenior blasts Chelsea flops after 'unacceptable' Brighton defeat
-
Inter roar back to beat Como and reach Italian Cup final
-
Lens sweep past Toulouse to reach French Cup final
-
Brighton crush Chelsea to pile pressure on under-fire Rosenior
-
Strait of Hormuz blockade drives up costs at Panama Canal
-
Trump extends ceasefire, says giving Iran time to negotiate
-
Michelle Bachelet hopes the world is ready for a female UN chief
-
Nowitzki, Bird among eight inductees into FIBA Hall of Fame
-
Stocks fall, oil climbs amid uncertainty over US-Iran talks
-
Iran war means more orders for US defense giants
Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts
Despite warnings, Australia's efforts to save the Great Barrier Reef still fall short of protecting the world's largest coral reef system from pollution and climate change, experts said Monday.
Australia had taken unprecedented steps towards the protection of the Great Barrier Reef, which the United Nations has designated a world heritage site, but more was needed to avoid the site being declared "in danger" by UNESCO, the UN agency which compiles and manages a list of heritage sites.
Such a designation puts a government on notice that a site could be removed from the World Heritage list altogether, a very rare event.
"Despite the unparalleled science and management efforts" made by Australia over recent years, the Great Barrier Reef is "significantly impacted by climate change factors", Eleanor Carter at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and UNESCO representative Hans Thulstrup said in a report based on a mission to the Reef.
"The resilience of the property to recover from climate change impacts is substantially compromised," they said.
Carter and Thulstrup recommended that the reef should be added to the "World Heritage in Danger" list.
The Australian government in January announced a billion-dollar package to protect the reef, seven years after its "Reef 2050" plan, already a response to a UN downgrade threat.
The Climate Council pressure group said this latest package of funding was like putting "a Band-Aid on a broken leg".
Monday's report echoed that assessment, saying the reef's ability to recover from climate change impacts was "substantially compromised".
In particular, Australian strategies were "lacking clear climate change targets", while some measures were not fully implemented, especially concerning "water quality and fisheries activities", it said.
Australia reported in May that 91 percent of the reef's coral had been damaged by bleaching after a prolonged summer heatwave, a process that increases the mortality rates of the affected corals.
After intense lobbying, Australia narrowly avoided the Reef being placed on UNESCO's "in danger" list in the summer of 2021.
The then-government of conservative prime minister Scott Morrison was voted out this year in favour of a centre-left government under Anthony Albanese who has promised greener policies.
A UNESCO spokesperson told AFP that "a constructive dialogue is ongoing with the current government".
A source close to the matter called Monday's report "a roadmap submitted to the Australian government which should say what it intends to do with it and produce results".
The source added: "The path to saving the Great Barrier Reef is narrow, but it exists. Strong and rapid action can produce results.".
To be included on UNESCO's world heritage list, a site must have "outstanding universal value".
An spot on the list usually means boosted tourism, and improved access to funds and to scientific expertise.
Those benefits are threatened when a site is declared "in danger" -- which is currently the case of about 50 sites worldwide.
Only three sites have ever been dropped from the heritage list completely.
N.Shalabi--SF-PST