
-
France steps closer to defining rape as lack of consent
-
SpaceX Starship explodes during routine test
-
Belgrade show plots path out of Balkan labyrinth of pain
-
Thailand's 'Yellow Shirts' return to streets demand PM quit
-
Stocks drop after Fed comments as Mideast fears lift crude
-
Govts scramble to evacuate citizens from Israel, Iran
-
'Moving Great Wall': China unleash towering teen basketball star
-
Nippon Steel closes US Steel acquisition under strict conditions
-
Fundraising shift at NY pride as Trump scares off corporate donors
-
Kenyan LGBTQ community vogues despite threat of repressive law
-
Thai PM apologises as crisis threatens to topple government
-
Iran strikes Israel as Trump weighs US involvement
-
Shortages hit Nigeria's drive towards natural gas-fuelled cars
-
S.Africa's iconic protea flower relocates as climate warms
-
Thai PM faces growing calls to quit following Cambodia phone row
-
Mutilation ban and microchips: EU lawmakers vote on cat and dog welfare
-
Czechs sign record nuclear deal but questions remain
-
Suaalii fit to face Lions but O'Connor left out by Wallabies for Fiji Test
-
Myanmar's Aung San Suu Kyi marks 80th birthday in junta jail
-
Homeland insecurity: Expelled Afghans seek swift return to Pakistan
-
Mushroom murder suspect fell sick from same meal: defence
-
New Zealand coroner raises alarm over 'perilous' collision sport
-
Syrians watch Iran-Israel crossfire as government stays silent
-
India start new era without Kohli and Rohit against England
-
Asian stocks drop after Fed warning, oil dips with Mideast in focus
-
Juventus thump Al Ain in Club World Cup after Trump visit
-
Williams boost for Crusaders ahead of Chiefs Super Rugby showdown
-
Trump weighs involvement as Israel launches fresh strikes on Iran
-
Nippon, US Steel complete partnership deal
-
Chile ups hake catch limits for small-scale fishermen
-
Taiwan pursues homegrown Chinese spies as Beijing's influence grows
-
Myanmar's Aung San Suu Kyi marks 80th in junta jail
-
Hurricane Erick strengthens as it barrels toward Mexico
-
Thai PM faces growing calls to quit in Cambodia phone row
-
Justice at stake as generative AI enters the courtroom
-
Donnarumma warns PSG 'hungry' for more success at Club World Cup
-
From Tehran to Toronto via Turkey: an Iranian's bid to flee war
-
Bolivia risks debt default without new funding: president to AFP
-
Messi fit to face Porto: Inter Miami's Mascherano
-
Waymo looks to test its self-driving cars in New York
-
Lakers to be sold in record-breaking $10 billion deal: ESPN
-
Real Madrid held by Al-Hilal after Man City win Club World Cup opener
-
Warning signs on climate flashing bright red: top scientists
-
Real Madrid held by Al-Hilal in Alsonso's debut
-
Korda 'hungry' for Women's PGA after US Open heartbreak
-
US stocks flat as Fed keeps rates steady, oil prices gyrate
-
US to screen social media of foreign students for anti-American content
-
'Argentina with Cristina': Thousands rally for convicted ex-president
-
Guardiola hails new signings as Man City survive 'tough conditions'
-
Gaza rescuers say 33 killed by Israel fire

Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts
Despite warnings, Australia's efforts to save the Great Barrier Reef still fall short of protecting the world's largest coral reef system from pollution and climate change, experts said Monday.
Australia had taken unprecedented steps towards the protection of the Great Barrier Reef, which the United Nations has designated a world heritage site, but more was needed to avoid the site being declared "in danger" by UNESCO, the UN agency which compiles and manages a list of heritage sites.
Such a designation puts a government on notice that a site could be removed from the World Heritage list altogether, a very rare event.
"Despite the unparalleled science and management efforts" made by Australia over recent years, the Great Barrier Reef is "significantly impacted by climate change factors", Eleanor Carter at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and UNESCO representative Hans Thulstrup said in a report based on a mission to the Reef.
"The resilience of the property to recover from climate change impacts is substantially compromised," they said.
Carter and Thulstrup recommended that the reef should be added to the "World Heritage in Danger" list.
The Australian government in January announced a billion-dollar package to protect the reef, seven years after its "Reef 2050" plan, already a response to a UN downgrade threat.
The Climate Council pressure group said this latest package of funding was like putting "a Band-Aid on a broken leg".
Monday's report echoed that assessment, saying the reef's ability to recover from climate change impacts was "substantially compromised".
In particular, Australian strategies were "lacking clear climate change targets", while some measures were not fully implemented, especially concerning "water quality and fisheries activities", it said.
Australia reported in May that 91 percent of the reef's coral had been damaged by bleaching after a prolonged summer heatwave, a process that increases the mortality rates of the affected corals.
After intense lobbying, Australia narrowly avoided the Reef being placed on UNESCO's "in danger" list in the summer of 2021.
The then-government of conservative prime minister Scott Morrison was voted out this year in favour of a centre-left government under Anthony Albanese who has promised greener policies.
A UNESCO spokesperson told AFP that "a constructive dialogue is ongoing with the current government".
A source close to the matter called Monday's report "a roadmap submitted to the Australian government which should say what it intends to do with it and produce results".
The source added: "The path to saving the Great Barrier Reef is narrow, but it exists. Strong and rapid action can produce results.".
To be included on UNESCO's world heritage list, a site must have "outstanding universal value".
An spot on the list usually means boosted tourism, and improved access to funds and to scientific expertise.
Those benefits are threatened when a site is declared "in danger" -- which is currently the case of about 50 sites worldwide.
Only three sites have ever been dropped from the heritage list completely.
N.Shalabi--SF-PST