-
Two dead as Istanbul endures heaviest rainfall in 80 years
-
France charges teen shooter citing revenge for bullying in school
-
After latest Nepal flood, survivors fear for future
-
Martinez blames 'anger' for dig at Man Utd hierarchy
-
EU leaders clash over budget as spectre of French elections looms
-
Crowds build as Albanian PM tours protest aftermath
-
'No place to breathe': life in Indonesia's fire epicentre
-
China-North Korea bridge opens, 12 years late
-
'Can't sleep': Spain's housing crunch upends lives
-
Asian Cup in Saudi Arabia could be postponed but 'no hurry' to decide: AFC
-
Musk calls on Ukraine's Zelensky to 'go' after satellite slowdown row
-
Conrad wields axe after South Africa loss to Australia
-
Still smiling at 117, Albanian may be world's oldest woman
-
School roof collapse kills teacher, 27 children in NW Pakistan
-
Pope has 'good night' in hospital: Vatican
-
Haze turns Indonesia skies orange, shuts schools in East Timor
-
China's economy seen missing target as global shocks bite: AFP poll
-
California puts first US billionaire tax to the vote
-
Costa Rica opens jail inspired by El Salvador mega-prison
-
School headscarf ban meets resistance in Austria
-
Same-sex couple takes fight for equality to Slovakian court
-
World's top cocoa producer aims for a climate-tough bean
-
'High hopes' as Indonesian women get a football league, again
-
Why is Shell facing lawsuits over climate disasters in Brazil and the Philippines?
-
'Expectations high' for Bordeaux-Begles' Champions Cup hat-trick bid, says Depoortere
-
New four-lane bridge opens between China, North Korea
-
Rennie urges All Blacks to stay focused against 'hurting' Wallabies
-
Tech stocks lead rout after US inflation fuels rate hike bets
-
Palmeiras beat Fluminense 2-1 in Libertadores semi-final first leg
-
'No time to recover': UNDP chief sounds alarm on growing poverty after Iran war shock
-
Brewers blasts leave Dodgers on brink
-
Australia says won't let big tech have 'unfettered' access to kids
-
Tech stock lead rout after US inflation fuels rate hike bets
-
Mobile clinics battle Mongolia's childhood dental 'disaster'
-
Al-Fayed survivors say UK police missing 'bigger picture'
-
Wallabies back Meredith as playmaker for second New Zealand Test
-
Online 'witch hunt' sweeps up Asians misidentified as US rape accused
-
Messi's Inter Miami book playoffs with 2-0 win over New York City
-
Prospect of Bolsonaro win looms large over Brazil's Indigenous
-
Oil-rich Alberta tests Canada's unity with secession vote
-
Freed from Belarus, founder of Lady Gaga's biggest fan site tells his story
-
EU leaders head for showdown over bloc budget
-
Behind AI's carbon footprint, a potential climate tool
-
All Blacks make three changes for second Wallabies Test
-
Trump's new press secretary faces scrutiny over credentials
-
Mourinho blasts 'shameless' timing of Vinicius ban decision
-
PSG 'got lucky' to win Man City thriller, says Luis Enrique
-
PSG beat Man City in Champions League thriller, Barcola hits Liverpool hat-trick
-
Real Madrid comeback stuns Roma as Mourinho enjoys happy reunion
-
US Treasury chief urges stronger IMF role against 'distortionary policies'
US would know if Russia prepares nuclear strike: experts
The United States would almost certainly discover ahead of time if Russia was preparing a nuclear strike on Ukraine, and Moscow might very well want it known, nuclear weapons experts say.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has raised the possibility of using nuclear weapons if Russia's "territorial integrity" or existence is threatened.
Moscow's declaration Friday that it was annexing four partly-occupied regions of Ukraine potentially meant Russia could consider responding to attacks on the claimed territory with a nuclear strike.
Should such an escalation materialize, it would probably be in the form of a smaller tactical nuclear weapon, likely launched on a short-range Iskander ballistic missile, according to experts.
While military analysts downplay Moscow's threats for now and US officials say they have seen no activity indicating such plans, Western defense and intelligence are closely watching to see if real atomic threats emerge.
- Where are the bombs? -
Preparations for an attack would be evident, Pavel Podvig, a senior researcher at the UN Institute for Disarmament Research in Geneva, told AFP.
A 2017 report by the institute maps out 47 nuclear storage sites across Russia -- 12 national-level facilities and 35 base facilities.
These are monitored constantly by intelligence and military surveillance satellites of the United States and other countries.
They can even be watched closely by commercial satellites, as shown by the widespread, regularly updated imagery of activities at North Korean nuclear facilities.
Podvig says Russia has deployed its strategic or long-range nuclear warheads in the field, on missiles, bombers and submarines.
But its non-strategic or tactical nuclear weapons, which number as many as 2,000, are stored and not installed on delivery vehicles like the Iskander, according to Podvig.
"There are no Iskanders roaming around with nuclear-armed warheads. These weapons are in storage," he said.
- How would we know? -
"I'm confident the United States would see any Russian preparations for using nuclear weapons," said Mark Cancian, a former official in the US defense and energy departments who worked on nuclear weapons issues.
"The weapons need to come out of storage, the units involved need to be alerted, and the Russians might also alert their strategic nuclear forces," Cancian, now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, told AFP.
He said evidence would also come from likely visible preparations for Russia's ground forces, issuing them protective equipment and instructions on how to act in a nuclear environment.
"All of this would be visible," he noted.
Podvig said Moscow, like Washington, has for decades embraced the need for disciplined management of its nuclear warheads, and that system is fairly strong and visible.
"We can be quite certain that there are no hidden facilities," he said.
"Nuclear weapons need a certain structure, people who are trained, and the maintenance. You cannot do that in a random place."
"Technically you could probably smuggle a couple of bombs out of a storage sight undetected," he said.
But doing so has risks, including provoking a preemptive attack from the West.
"The Russians will never be certain that it is undetected. That would be a gamble," said Podvig.
Moreover, he added, it is more likely that Russia would want the West to see its preparations as a warning.
"It would be the kind of escalatory step (and) Russia would want that to be visible," Podvig said.
- Warning the world -
The United States warned for weeks before the February 24 invasion that Russia intended to attack Ukraine, seeking to prepare Kyiv and allies -- and possibly deter Moscow from acting.
Would Washington warn the world openly if it detected Russia planning a nuclear assault? Doing so could spark unprecedented panic, not only in Ukraine but other areas that could be affected by radioactive fallout.
Such alarm could go global if people expected an escalation to transcontinental nuclear war.
The United States would almost certainly warn allies and other powers, including crucially China and India, hoping they would pressure Moscow to pull back or face international isolation.
But Washington would likely see issuing public warnings as useful in adding to pressure on Russia, according to Podvig.
"The strategy has to be based on isolation. The unacceptability of this has to be reinforced, that it is criminal," he said.
"That message might have deterrence value."
M.AbuKhalil--SF-PST