-
Germany 'send message' with Slovakia rout to reach 2026 World Cup
-
Trump unveils fast-track visas for World Cup ticket holders
-
Netherlands qualify for World Cup, Poland in play-offs
-
Germany crush Slovakia to qualify for 2026 World Cup
-
Stocks gloomy on earnings and tech jitters, US rate worries
-
'In it to win it': Australia doubles down on climate hosting bid
-
Former NFL star Brown could face 30 yrs jail for shooting case: prosecutor
-
Fate of Canada government hinges on tight budget vote
-
New research measures how much plastic is lethal for marine life
-
Mbappe, PSG face off in multi-million lawsuit
-
EU defends carbon tax as ministers take over COP30 negotiations
-
McCartney to release silent AI protest song
-
Stocks tepid on uncertainty over earnings, tech rally, US rates
-
Louvre shuts gallery over ceiling safety fears
-
'Stranded, stressed' giraffes in Kenya relocated as habitats encroached
-
US Supreme Court to hear migrant asylum claim case
-
Western aid cuts could cause 22.6 million deaths, researchers say
-
Clarke hails Scotland 'legends' ahead of crunch World Cup qualifier
-
S.Africa says 'suspicious' flights from Israel show 'agenda to cleanse Palestinians'
-
South Korea pledges to phase out coal plants at COP30
-
Ex-PSG footballer Hamraoui claims 3.5m euros damages against club
-
Mbappe, PSG in counterclaims worth hundreds of millions
-
Two newly discovered Bach organ works unveiled in Germany
-
Stocks lower on uncertainty over earnings, tech rally, US rates
-
Barca to make long-awaited Camp Nou return on November 22
-
COP30 talks enter homestretch with UN warning against 'stonewalling'
-
France makes 'historic' accord to sell Ukraine 100 warplanes
-
Delhi car bombing accused appears in Indian court, another suspect held
-
Emirates orders 65 more Boeing 777X planes despite delays
-
Ex-champion Joshua to fight YouTube star Jake Paul
-
Bangladesh court sentences ex-PM to be hanged for crimes against humanity
-
Trade tensions force EU to cut 2026 eurozone growth forecast
-
'Killed without knowing why': Sudanese exiles relive Darfur's past
-
Stocks lower on uncertainty over tech rally, US rates
-
Death toll from Indonesia landslides rises to 18
-
Macron, Zelensky sign accord for Ukraine to buy French fighter jets
-
India Delhi car bomb accused appears in court
-
Bangladesh ex-PM sentenced to be hanged for crimes against humanity
-
Leftist, far-right candidates advance to Chilean presidential run-off
-
Bangladesh's Hasina: from PM to crimes against humanity convict
-
Rugby chiefs unveil 'watershed' Nations Championship
-
EU predicts less eurozone 2026 growth due to trade tensions
-
Swiss growth suffered from US tariffs in Q3: data
-
Bangladesh ex-PM sentenced to death for crimes against humanity
-
Singapore jails 'attention seeking' Australian over Ariana Grande incident
-
Tom Cruise receives honorary Oscar for illustrious career
-
Fury in China over Japan PM's Taiwan comments
-
Carbon capture promoters turn up in numbers at COP30: NGO
-
Japan-China spat over Taiwan comments sinks tourism stocks
-
No Wemby, no Castle, no problem as NBA Spurs rip Kings
Kirk killing sparks fierce US free speech debate
For Americans, the words are practically sacred: the First Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees freedom of speech.
But that right is now the subject of bitter debate, following the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
On Thursday, several high-ranking Democrats accused President Donald Trump of waging war on free speech, after he celebrated ABC's suspension of talk show host Jimmy Kimmel, who accused the political right of using Kirk's death to score points.
The American Civil Liberties Union, a rights advocacy group, accused the Trump administration of operating outside constitutional safeguards to target its opponents, likening it to the Red Scare of the late 1940 and 1950s under senator Joseph McCarthy.
"This is beyond McCarthyism. Trump officials are repeatedly abusing their power to stop ideas they don't like, deciding who can speak, write, and even joke," said Christopher Anders, director of the ACLU's democracy and technology division.
So what does the First Amendment say? And why is it up for debate?
- 'How we identify ourselves' -
Ratified in 1791, the Bill of Rights comprises the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution, protecting the fundamental rights of Americans.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble," the First Amendment says.
For David Super, a professor at Georgetown University's law school, the amendment is "really how we identify ourselves as a nation."
Beyond the varied ethnicities and background of the nation's 340 million people, "we are thought to be drawn together by a belief in open discussion and a belief that the government can't shut any of us up," Super told AFP.
The First Amendment even protects speech that is "morally repulsive," explained Eugene Volokh, a professor of law at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Volokh however emphasized that the history of the United States has been marked by attempts to stifle dissident voices.
- 'Malicious writings' -
In 1798, America's second president John Adams signed into law the Sedition Act, which forbade "any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States."
Then during World War I, the expression of pacifist ideology was banned.
From the 1920s to the 1950s, anyone expressing support for communist ideals risked serious repercussions. And in the 1960s, officials in several southern US states battled to silence the civil rights movement.
One of the key pillars of Trump's political movement has been to eviscerate "cancel culture" -- the process of criticizing someone for voicing an opinion seen as unacceptable, to the point of that person being ostracized or fired.
Trump has often called "cancel culture" a scourge of leftist progressives, claiming that it has been used to silence conservative pundits and politicians.
But Democrats have turned the tables on Trump, accusing him of doing the same to US media organizations, major universities and, now, Kimmel -- a frequent target of Trump's ire.
"After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level," Democratic former president Barack Obama wrote Thursday on X.
- Conservative push-back -
US Attorney General Pam Bondi sparked controversy among conservatives by saying earlier this week that the Justice Department would pursue anyone guilty of "hate speech" linked to the slain influencer.
Republican Senator Ted Cruz quickly countered that the Constitution "absolutely protects hate speech." Bondi then said she meant to refer to "threats of violence that individuals incite against others."
Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson called for "civil disobedience" should Kirk's murder result in an uptick in laws limiting free speech.
And some voices on the far right have criticized a decree signed by Trump in August that makes burning the American flag punishable by up to a year in prison.
The US Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that burning the Stars and Stripes indeed amounted to free speech, and was protected by the First Amendment.
"I would never in a million years harm the American flag," conservative radio host Jesse Kelly wrote on X.
"But a president telling me I can't has me as close as I’ll ever be to lighting one on fire. I am a free American citizen. And if I ever feel like torching one, I will."
X.AbuJaber--SF-PST