-
Third suspect pleads guilty in US murder of Jam Master Jay
-
Milei bars media from presidential palace
-
Sabalenka reaches Madrid Open quarters, Zverev pushes through
-
California billionaire tax appears headed to the ballot
-
Trump, Melania slam Kimmel for 'widow' joke
-
Trains collide near Jakarta, killing four, injuring dozens
-
Kompany hails Kane, 'ageing like fine wine' as Bayern face PSG in Champions League
-
UK's King Charles arrives in US to shore up Trump ties
-
Tuareg rebels in control of key Mali town
-
US Supreme Court hears Bayer bid to end Roundup weedkiller suits
-
Separate goals, common enemy for Mali's jihadists and separatists
-
Accused media gala shooter charged with attempted Trump assassination
-
UK's King Charles seeks to shore up Trump ties
-
Tourism plummets in US-blockaded Cuba
-
Taylor Swift files to trademark her voice amid AI clone boom
-
Sabalenka reaches Madrid Open quarters, Gauff bows out
-
Trains collide outside Jakarta, killing four: officials
-
EU tells Google to open Android to AI rivals
-
Italian Calzona quits as Slovakia coach
-
Jury selection starts in Elon Musk's legal battle with OpenAI
-
21 killed in deadliest Colombia bombing in decades
-
Hazlewood, Kumar spark Delhi collapse as Bengaluru romp to victory
-
UN maritime agency rejects Hormuz tolls
-
Human Rights Watch warns of 'exclusion and fear' at World Cup
-
Tuareg rebels in control of key Mali town after offensive
-
Joshua signs deal to face Fury in all-British grudge match
-
Iran FM blames US for failure of talks as he meets with Putin
-
Melania Trump slams Kimmel joke likening her to an 'expectant widow'
-
Carney launches $18 billion Canada sovereign wealth fund
-
Modric suffers fractured cheekbone, will go under the knife: AC Milan
-
'Looming' risk of nuclear arms race, UN proliferation meeting hears
-
Suspect due in court over shooting at Trump gala
-
Iran FM blames US for failure of talks before meeting with Putin
-
Sabalenka downs Osaka to reach Madrid Open quarter-finals
-
'Nobody is better than us' says Luis Enrique as PSG prepare for Bayern
-
Hridoy, Shamim pull off record home chase for Bangladesh against NZ
-
Thrilling Kvaratskhelia hoping to drive PSG to another Champions League final
-
Swiss canton votes with centuries-old show of hands
-
Mali attacks kill defence minister, deepening security crisis
-
How remarkable Sawe made marathon history in London
-
British Open to be staged at Royal Lytham and St Annes in 2028
-
Oil rises, stocks steady as US-Iran peace talk hopes wobble
-
Mbappe doubt for Clasico after Real Madrid confirm thigh injury
-
Salah will get fitting Liverpool farewell despite injury, says Van Dijk
-
African players in Europe: Injury may end Salah's Liverpool reign
-
Simons out of World Cup and Spurs relegation fight
-
China blocks Meta's acquisition of AI firm Manus
-
US woman speaks of ordeal in France Al-Fayed trafficking probe
-
French teen faces jail in Singapore for licking vending machine straw
-
Iran FM blames US for failure of talks after landing in Russia
Kirk killing sparks fierce US free speech debate
For Americans, the words are practically sacred: the First Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees freedom of speech.
But that right is now the subject of bitter debate, following the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
On Thursday, several high-ranking Democrats accused President Donald Trump of waging war on free speech, after he celebrated ABC's suspension of talk show host Jimmy Kimmel, who accused the political right of using Kirk's death to score points.
The American Civil Liberties Union, a rights advocacy group, accused the Trump administration of operating outside constitutional safeguards to target its opponents, likening it to the Red Scare of the late 1940 and 1950s under senator Joseph McCarthy.
"This is beyond McCarthyism. Trump officials are repeatedly abusing their power to stop ideas they don't like, deciding who can speak, write, and even joke," said Christopher Anders, director of the ACLU's democracy and technology division.
So what does the First Amendment say? And why is it up for debate?
- 'How we identify ourselves' -
Ratified in 1791, the Bill of Rights comprises the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution, protecting the fundamental rights of Americans.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble," the First Amendment says.
For David Super, a professor at Georgetown University's law school, the amendment is "really how we identify ourselves as a nation."
Beyond the varied ethnicities and background of the nation's 340 million people, "we are thought to be drawn together by a belief in open discussion and a belief that the government can't shut any of us up," Super told AFP.
The First Amendment even protects speech that is "morally repulsive," explained Eugene Volokh, a professor of law at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Volokh however emphasized that the history of the United States has been marked by attempts to stifle dissident voices.
- 'Malicious writings' -
In 1798, America's second president John Adams signed into law the Sedition Act, which forbade "any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States."
Then during World War I, the expression of pacifist ideology was banned.
From the 1920s to the 1950s, anyone expressing support for communist ideals risked serious repercussions. And in the 1960s, officials in several southern US states battled to silence the civil rights movement.
One of the key pillars of Trump's political movement has been to eviscerate "cancel culture" -- the process of criticizing someone for voicing an opinion seen as unacceptable, to the point of that person being ostracized or fired.
Trump has often called "cancel culture" a scourge of leftist progressives, claiming that it has been used to silence conservative pundits and politicians.
But Democrats have turned the tables on Trump, accusing him of doing the same to US media organizations, major universities and, now, Kimmel -- a frequent target of Trump's ire.
"After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level," Democratic former president Barack Obama wrote Thursday on X.
- Conservative push-back -
US Attorney General Pam Bondi sparked controversy among conservatives by saying earlier this week that the Justice Department would pursue anyone guilty of "hate speech" linked to the slain influencer.
Republican Senator Ted Cruz quickly countered that the Constitution "absolutely protects hate speech." Bondi then said she meant to refer to "threats of violence that individuals incite against others."
Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson called for "civil disobedience" should Kirk's murder result in an uptick in laws limiting free speech.
And some voices on the far right have criticized a decree signed by Trump in August that makes burning the American flag punishable by up to a year in prison.
The US Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that burning the Stars and Stripes indeed amounted to free speech, and was protected by the First Amendment.
"I would never in a million years harm the American flag," conservative radio host Jesse Kelly wrote on X.
"But a president telling me I can't has me as close as I’ll ever be to lighting one on fire. I am a free American citizen. And if I ever feel like torching one, I will."
X.AbuJaber--SF-PST