
-
Kasatkina falls, Fonseca secures first win on grass at Eastbourne
-
Iran attacks US base in Qatar in retaliation for strikes on nuclear sites
-
Club World Cup prize money does not mean more pressure: Chelsea boss Maresca
-
Leeds sign Slovenia defender Bijol from Udinese
-
E.coli can turn plastic into painkillers, chemists discover
-
Bluff and last-minute orders: Trump's path to Iran decision
-
US strikes on Iran open rift in Trump's support base
-
Indiana's Haliburton has torn right Achilles tendon: reports
-
England rally after Pant heroics to set up thrilling finish to India opener
-
US hit by first extreme heat wave of the year
-
Holders Thailand among seven set for LPGA International Crown
-
England set 371 to win India series opener after Pant heroics
-
UK and Ukraine agree to deepen ties as Zelensky meets Starmer
-
New York state to build nuclear power plant
-
Syria announces arrests over Damascus church attack
-
Bradley eyes playing captain role at Ryder Cup after win
-
US existing home sales little-changed on sluggish market
-
Top US court takes case of Rastafarian whose hair was cut in prison
-
Greece declares emergency on Chios over wildfires
-
Embattled Thai PM reshuffles cabinet as crisis rages
-
Killer whales spotted grooming each other with seaweed
-
Where is Iran's uranium? Questions abound after US strikes
-
EU approves MotoGP takeover by F1 owner Liberty Media
-
Duplantis says vaulting 6.40m is within the 'realm of possibility'
-
Pant piles on agony for England with record-breaking century
-
NATO to take 'quantum leap' with 5% summit pledge: Rutte
-
Textor sells Crystal Palace stake to boost hopes of European competition
-
Earth's satellites at risk if asteroid smashes into Moon: study
-
Syria president vows those involved in church attack will face justice
-
Russian barrage kills 10 in Kyiv, including 11-year-old girl
-
Military bases or vital waterway: Iran weighs response to US strikes
-
Italian sculptor Arnaldo Pomodoro dies aged nearly 99
-
Rahul and Pant build India lead against England
-
UK probes maternity services after scandals
-
Asian countries most vulnerable to Strait of Hormuz blockade
-
Anger as Kanye West to perform in Slovakia after Hitler song
-
Israel targets Iran Guards, Tehran prison in fresh wave of strikes
-
Star-packed, Covid-shaped 'Death Stranding 2' drops this week
-
IOC is in 'best of hands', says Bach as he hands over to Coventry
-
Oil prices seesaw as investors await Iran response to US strikes
-
Beijing issues weather warning for hottest days of year
-
Tehran hit by Israeli attacks, vows response to US strikes
-
New CEO of Jeep owner Stellantis starts with leadership shake-up
-
Russian drone and missile barrage kills eight in Kyiv
-
Oil dips, dollar firms after US strikes in Iran
-
Paris Olympics and Paralympics cost taxpayer nearly 6 bn euros: state body
-
Eurozone business activity almost flat again in June
-
In Norway's Arctic, meteorologists have a first-row seat to climate change
-
Iran vows retaliation for US strikes as Israel keeps up attacks
-
Russian drone and missile barrage on Kyiv kills seven

Where is Iran's uranium? Questions abound after US strikes
After President Donald Trump bragged US strikes had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear capabilities, officials cautioned it was still too soon to assess the impact on the country's nuclear programme.
Many questions remain after Sunday's strikes, especially about the whereabouts of Iran's sensitive stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 percent -- a short step from the 90 percent required for a nuclear weapon.
- Where is Iran's enriched uranium? -
The US attacks, carried out by B-2 stealth bombers, targeted three Iranian nuclear sites: Isfahan and Iran's main enrichment plants in Fordo and Natanz.
While significant damage has been reported, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has voiced concern about Iran's stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium.
Tehran has an estimated 408.6 kilogrammes of uranium enriched to 60 percent, according to the UN nuclear watchdog, whose inspectors last saw that stockpile on June 10.
That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs.
IAEA head Rafael Grossi on Monday demanded access to Iran's nuclear sites, saying the agency needs to "account for" the uranium stockpile.
Concerns about the fate of the sensitive stockpile have loomed large. On June 13, the day Israel began its Iran offensive, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi sent a letter to the IAEA, announcing the implementation of "special measures to protect nuclear equipment and material".
Days before the US attacked, satellite imagery showed vehicles near Fordo's entrance.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had "interesting intelligence" on the matter, declining to elaborate.
Israel announced Monday it had carried out strikes to block access routes to Fordo.
"It will be difficult if not impossible to track down all of Iran's 60 percent enriched uranium, stored in small canisters that are easily transportable by car," Kelsey Davenport, an expert with the Arms Control Association, told AFP.
"They (Iranians) no longer have the capacity to turn that stockpile of highly enriched uranium to weapons-grade uranium, and that was really the goal there," US Vice President JD Vance told ABC News.
He added the Trump administration would deal with the uranium "in the coming weeks".
- Can Iran still make a nuclear bomb? -
Analysts have been treading carefully when addressing this issue.
Before the attacks, Iran had about 22,000 centrifuges -- the machines used to enrich uranium. Many of them were damaged when Natanz was hit, the IAEA head said.
Grossi also said "very significant damage" is expected to have occurred at Fordo, "given the explosive payload utilised and the extreme vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges".
Experts however say that it is unclear how many centrifuges Iran has, with some of them believed to be stored at unknown locations.
With "60 percent enriched uranium and a few hundred advanced centrifuges, Iran still has the capability to weaponise, and now there is more political impetus to dash for a bomb", said Davenport.
- What are the proliferation risks? -
Before the conflict, the IAEA said it had "no indication" of the existence of a "systematic programme" in Iran to produce a nuclear weapon. But without access to nuclear sites, the agency no longer has oversight.
Grossi warned Monday that the "global non-proliferation regime that has underpinned international security... could crumble and fall", urging parties to return to diplomacy.
Iran ratified the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT) in 1970, committing it to declare its nuclear material to the IAEA. But it has recently begun preparing the grounds for a possible withdrawal from the treaty, accusing the agency of acting as a "partner" in Israel's "war of aggression".
Reza Najafi, Iran's ambassador to the IAEA, said Monday the "unlawful act of aggression" by the United States had "delivered a fundamental and irreparable blow" to the non-proliferation regime.
"I do think there is a major risk that Iran withdraws from the NPT and expels inspectors, or simply does not provide them with access to key sites," said Eric Brewer of the US research institute Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI).
He added that Iran could also "over time, build (a) covert" programme like North Korea, which withdrew from the NPT in 2003 and went on to become a nuclear-armed power.
S.AbuJamous--SF-PST