-
Alcaraz faces Shelton in blockbuster US Open quarter-final
-
UK PM denounces 'politics of poison' after anti-migrant protests
-
Trump threatens sales in US of Canadian aircraft maker Bombardier
-
Comeback queen Zheng strikes again for US Open quarter-final berth
-
Eiffel Tower closed in row over women removed for Hindu group
-
Third absence for injured Hadjar as Lawson fills in again in Spain
-
Willemse replaces Kolbe for Springboks' All Blacks series decider
-
Far-right victory in Germany draws protesters in Berlin
-
Zheng shocks Swiatek in another incredible US Open comeback
-
CapTLX Launches Institutional Gateway to U.S. Private Markets, Expanding Access to Structured Investment Opportunities
-
Andreeva survives in three sets against Potapova
-
Africa's richest man eyes continent's largest IPO
-
Alleged killers of Australian, US surfers go on trial in Mexico
-
Macron, SKorea leader warn at film summit of AI risks to creativity
-
King Charles classes Harry and Meghan as 'private citizens'
-
'Impressive' Alcaraz has Shelton in sights in US Open quarter-final
-
Bowling coach Noffke says Pakistan's off-field issues are nothing new
-
Noosha Aubel a krize v Postupimi: Jak dlouho je ještě možné tolerovat toto selhání vedení?
-
Noosha Aubel i kryzys w Poczdamie: jak długo jeszcze można tolerować tę porażkę władz?
-
Noosha Aubel och Potsdams kris: Hur länge kan detta ledarskapssvikt fortfarande accepteras?
-
ヌーシャ・オーベルとポツダムの危機:この指導力の欠如は、いつまで容認され続けるのか?
-
Η Noosha Aubel και η κρίση του Πότσνταμ: Για πόσο ακόμα είναι ανεκτή αυτή η διαχειριστική αποτυχία;
-
Нуша Аубель и кризис в Потсдаме: как долго ещё можно мириться с таким провалом руководства?
-
नूशा ऑबेल और पॉट्सडैम का संकट: नेतृत्व की इस विफलता को और कितना सहन किया जा सकता है?
-
누샤 아우벨과 포츠담의 위기: 이러한 리더십 부재는 얼마나 더 용인될 수 있는가?
-
努莎·奧貝爾與波茨坦的危機:這種領導失職還能容忍多久?
-
نوشا أوبيل وأزمة بوتسدام: إلى متى سيظل هذا الفشل القيادي مقبولاً؟
-
Нуша Аубель і криза в Потсдамі: як довго ще можна миритися з цією неспроможністю керівництва?
-
Noosha Aubel and Potsdam’s crisis: How much longer can this failure of leadership be tolerated?
-
England quick Archer in 'good place' after injuries
-
US envoy sees 'movement' toward three-way talks with Russia, Ukraine
-
Robots protest rampant AI in Poland
-
Thousands bid farewell to Bosnian Serb war criminal in Belgrade
-
Rare woman director in Venice sees industry backsliding on gender
-
EU chief announces 200-mn-euro investment package for Greenland
-
France, SKorea warn at film summit of AI risks to creativity
-
Lebanon says Israel conducts wave of deadly strikes
-
Z Traders Introduces New Funding Model Designed to Expand Opportunities in Trading
-
Cipheras Group - Apex AI Fund Deploys 290-Billion-Parameter Proprietary Large Language Model
-
Lebanon says 12 killed in strikes as Israel vows to 'remove threats'
-
Germany's Merz 'shocked' by far-right state win but vows to stay course
-
Volkswagen plant to be converted for Israeli defence group
-
UK finance minister Healey pledges strict fiscal discipline as budget looms
-
Israeli rubble-clearing in Gaza could erase 'atrocity crimes' evidence: UN expert
-
Mbappe embraces Ballon d'Or talk after historic World Cup exploits
-
Scorching summer pushes French wine harvest to new historic low
-
Tech firms rally, with eyes on US inflation update
-
Pietersen joins England coaching team ahead of World Cup
-
Jaguar Land Rover to cut 4,000 jobs as European car sector hits skids
-
Germany's triumphant far-right AfD aims fire at Merz
Democrats assail 'erratic' Trump over Iran strikes
Democrats bristled Sunday over US President Donald Trump's decision to launch air strikes on Iran without seeking authorization from Congress, accusing the Republican of violating the constitution and demanding a vote to rein in his war powers.
Members of the Senate and House of Representatives argued that US intelligence had not shown an imminent threat from the Middle Eastern country that justified Trump's unilateral action.
"President Trump's actions in bombing Iran puts the US on the brink of a wider war in the Middle East, all without constitutionally required Congressional approval," Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin said in a statement.
Democrats were divided between those demanding a vote on a war powers resolution to constrain Trump's authority to launch further action and a smaller group, who maintained that the strikes were grounds for the Republican leader's impeachment.
They included Illinois moderate Sean Casten and New York leftist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who accused the president of having "impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations."
Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, the Democratic leaders in the Senate and House respectively, said Trump had "dramatically increased" America's risk of becoming embroiled in a new Middle Eastern conflagration.
"No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy," Schumer said.
The Democrats have foreign policy hawks in their ranks and many were quick to point to the threat that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose --- while still upbraiding Trump for acting without consulting lawmakers.
"The Constitution makes clear that the power to authorize war lies with Congress... The American people deserve more than vague rhetoric and unilateral decisions that could set off a wider war," said Mark Warner, vice chairman of the Senate intelligence committee.
The loudest Democratic voice in support of the strikes was staunchly pro-Israel Senator John Fetterman, who singled out Trump for praise -- something even party colleagues who support the strikes have avoided.
"As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by (Trump)," the Pennsylvania centrist posted on X. "Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities."
Republicans have been lining up since the strikes to praise Trump and endorse his decision to hit three Iranian nuclear facilities -- with little dissent among the ranks.
But Kentucky conservative Thomas Massie accused Trump of escalating the conflict between Israel and Iran.
"When two countries are bombing each other daily in a hot war, and a third country joins the bombing, that's an act of war," said Massie, who introduced a bipartisan resolution earlier this month to require any military action to be approved by lawmakers.
"I'm amazed at the mental gymnastics being undertaken by neocons in DC (and their social media bots) to say we aren’t at war... so they can make war."
M.Qasim--SF-PST