-
Morocco back coach Ouahbi after World Cup exit
-
Germany and France seek 'new dynamic' on defence after fighter jet failure
-
France, England prepare for gloomy World Cup send-off
-
'King' James keeps NBA guessing on next team
-
Trump speech to focus on election 'integrity'
-
Will Tuchel have to rebuild trust after England World Cup exit?
-
Hamilton urges Ferrari to intensify their efforts in title bid at Spa
-
Verstappen takes old rear wing in place of 'super-dangerous' upgrade
-
Merlier looking to 'survive' Tour de France until Paris
-
At least 12,000 excess deaths in Europe's June heatwave: AFP analysis
-
Scheffler makes steady start, DeChambeau one off the lead at British Open
-
Master and apprentice as Spain, Argentina coaches meet in World Cup final
-
Chile's Senate OKs business-friendly economic reforms
-
Archer stars as England dismiss India for 233 in 2nd ODI
-
Stocks drop on tech sell-off, oil yo-yos on Mideast
-
US unveils 25% tariff on certain goods from Brazil, drawing rebuke
-
Hazardous wildfire smoke chokes millions in US, Canada
-
Merlier claims hat-trick of Tour de France stage wins
-
US limits stays of students, journalists
-
French PM pledges deeper ties on Morocco visit
-
New science report could boost climate suits against oil giants
-
Devastating Asian beetle detected in EU for first time
-
Rosenior ready for Paris FC challenge after 'learning lessons' at Chelsea
-
Putin leading Russia to 'chaos', anti-war politician says
-
Ukraine's ousted defence chief whose reforms riled army bosses
-
US retail sales lose steam in June as consumers spend less on gasoline
-
Bitter row splits Ukraine's military leadership after defence minister ousted
-
Stocks drop on tech sell-off, oil rises on Mideast unrest
-
Italy court finds 32 people guilty over deadly Genoa bridge collapse
-
Germany and France seek to 'bounce back' from fighter jet failure
-
Regulator backs extension of Spain's largest nuclear plant
-
Ex-Italian highway head gets 12 years for deadly Genoa bridge collapse
-
Court confirms graft trial for Spanish PM's wife
-
Scheffler makes fast start to defence of British Open
-
UK minister urges FIFA to investigate Argentina over World Cup Falklands banner
-
No start for Pollock as England name unchanged side for Argentina clash
-
Farnborough to survey the state of Boeing's comeback
-
Young British hackers jailed for London transport cyberattack
-
EU tells Google to share search data, open Android to AI rivals
-
Protests erupt across Ukraine against defence minister's ouster
-
Uber to gobble up Delivery Hero in latest food delivery deal
-
US still world's biggest air transport market, but growth slows: data
-
South Africa's rooibos heads to space
-
Hearts and Scotland keeper Gordon retires
-
'Lost his Tuch?' -- England boss hammered by media after World Cup exit
-
Stocks drop, oil steadies tracking tech sell-off, Mideast unrest
-
Climate change, urban growth fuel Lagos flooding
-
Ukraine state energy boss Koretsky becomes new PM
-
Depleted Italy make nine changes for Australia Test
-
Algae fed by farm waste carpet Italy's warm River Po
Trump has vowed sweeping tariffs: What comes next?
US president-elect Donald Trump says "tariff" is the most beautiful word in the dictionary -- and the Republican's second term promises sweeping measures on all $3 trillion worth of US imported goods.
This will not be the first time Trump has used tariffs to exert pressure on other countries. What should households and businesses expect?
- What did he pledge? -
Trump has promised at least a 10 percent tariff on all imports, and a higher level of 60 percent or more on Chinese goods -- stepping up levies on Beijing and others.
The aim, he said, was to target countries that had been "ripping us off for years" and to lower US trade deficits.
Trump has also suggested tariffs above 200 percent on vehicles from Mexico, saying this was to protect US auto firms.
In Pennsylvania this week, Trump threatened to take further aim at China and Mexico if they did not stop deadly fentanyl from entering the country.
Experts note, however, that when Washington imposes tariffs on imports, it is US businesses who pay the fees to the government.
- Can he do it? -
"The risk is significant," said Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the Cato Institute.
Laws exist that "allow the president to apply tariffs unilaterally for extremely broad and discretionary reasons," he told AFP.
This includes national security justifications, he said, pointing to what the US government did when imposing steel and aluminum tariffs in 2018.
Courts have also been "extremely reluctant to act as a check on that power," Lincicome added.
Experts have pointed to laws like the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which allows a president to declare a national emergency and restrict trade.
- What are the consequences? -
US consumers could lose $46 billion to $78 billion in spending power annually if new tariffs on imports are implemented, according to the National Retail Federation (NRF).
This applies if proposed tariffs were imposed on six product categories alone -- apparel, toys, furniture, household appliances, footwear and travel goods.
"Retailers rely heavily on imported products and manufacturing components so that they can offer their customers a variety of products at affordable prices," said Jonathan Gold, NRF vice president of supply chain and customs policy.
"This tax ultimately comes out of consumers' pockets through higher prices," he added.
For companies, uncertainty over US tariff regimes for their industries and retaliatory risks "will clearly be a huge problem when forward planning," said Ben May, director of global macro research at Oxford Economics.
- How might countries respond? -
When Washington slapped tariffs on 6.4 billion euros worth of European steel and aluminum exports in 2018, the EU retaliated with "rebalancing tariffs" on US exports -- hitting a value of 2.8 billion euros.
These have since been suspended but both sides have struggled to finalize a longer-term solution.
When the first Trump administration announced tariffs on hundreds of billions of Chinese products between July 2018 and August 2019, Beijing retaliated with tariffs on more than $185 billion of US products, the Brookings Institution noted.
Trump's aggressive trade actions left the US farm industry suffering from China's response, hitting soybeans especially hard with exports plunging.
The Trump administration paid out some $28 billion in aid to farmers hit by the trade war's consequences.
- Is there recourse? -
Across-the-board tariffs could violate US international trade obligations in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and with free trade area partners, said Jeffrey Schott, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE).
While other countries can challenge US actions, Schott noted that any dispute settlement process involving the United States will hit a wall as it can appeal any adverse panel ruling and there is no appellate body to hear the case.
Countries would likely retaliate instead, said Schott.
This could take the form of tariffs or other levers like regulatory approvals, the Cato Institute's Lincicome said.
Foreign governments would likely try to strike deals with the Trump administration as well, he added.
He noted that the first Trump government started free trade agreement talks with Kenya and renegotiated the North American Free Trade Agreement.
But it is unclear if his new policymakers will be similarly inclined to trade deals.
T.Khatib--SF-PST