-
Lyon down Palace in Europa League, Sunderland leave it late
-
Martinez apologises for outburst at Man Utd hierarchy
-
UniCredit says receives ECB green light for Commerzbank takeover
-
Houthis launch deadly attack on presidential palace in Yemen's Aden
-
New York City pension fund asks Anthropic to delay IPO
-
Brazil forward Antony says home burgled during Betis match
-
Venezuela's Maduro denies US torture charges as 'false accusations'
-
Ravens face familiar foe in Browns coach Monken
-
Somalia sets May presidential election despite insecurity
-
France, Germany reach deal on future of car industry
-
Chelsea's Caicedo eager to be more of a leader
-
Carney campaigns for Canadian unity before Alberta secession vote
-
Rahm reaches separation deal with LIV in bankruptcy court
-
ATP proposes rankings system changes, extra player bonuses
-
UN chief urges nations to end 'war on nature'
-
Russell Brand was 'monster-like', alleged victim tells UK court
-
Newcastle boss Jaissle says Fernandez-Pardo just needs a goal
-
Crowded Launches Crowded MCP, Bringing Nonprofit Financial Operations Into ChatGPT and Claude
-
Infantino offers apology but 'no answers' at FIFA meeting over World Cup plan
-
Albanian PM condemns 'chaos' as violent unrest spreads
-
Don't exclude Turkey from 'Made in Europe' plan: minister to AFP
-
Italian football suffers new blow with Champions League misery
-
French duo Justice to score 'GTA VI': game maker
-
Trump scraps plan to livestream execution after broad backlash
-
El Nino a 'terrifying' threat to coral reefs: UN biodiversity expert
-
Seven missing off Romania after latest Black Sea drone attacks
-
Barcola must get used to Liverpool highs and lows, says Iraola
-
ARKBRIDGE Outlines Jonathan Morelli’s “Picks and Shovels” AI Infrastructure Investment Strategy
-
Versus Trade Wins Best ECN/STP Broker APAC 2026, Marking Third UF Awards Recognition
-
Tech sell-off rolls on as hot inflation data stokes rate worries
-
Three dead as Istanbul sees heaviest rainfall in 80 years
-
McIlroy makes 'solid' start in rain-hit Delhi as Norgaard leads
-
US producer prices see biggest jump since 2022 in added challenge to Trump
-
Seven missing after fire on vessel in Black Sea off Romania
-
Swiatek avoids seed exodus to breeze into Wuhan last eight
-
'Severe drought' declared in parts of UK
-
PM condemns 'chaos' as violent protests grip Albania
-
IUX Announces New Web Client Portal Built for Enhanced Browser-Based Trading
-
'I couldn't breathe', Russell Brand's alleged rape victim says
-
School roof collapse kills teacher, 32 children in NW Pakistan
-
Pope's cancer operation already reshaping papacy
-
Inter skipper Martinez facing month out with thigh injury
-
Zverev cruises past De Minaur to reach Shanghai semi-finals
-
Spanish prosecutors back abuse probe into Julio Iglesias
-
Ukraine's Zelensky defies Trump with Russian refinery strikes
-
Tech sell-off deepens as US inflation sparks AI jitters
-
Holders Australia edge New Zealand 24-22 to open Rugby league World Cup
-
Southgate does not forsee a return to management
-
'Ocarina of Time': Nintendo gives Zelda classic a modern makeover
-
Two dead as Istanbul endures heaviest rainfall in 80 years
EU scores top court wins against Apple, Google
A top EU court on Tuesday delivered two major victories for Brussels by ruling against Apple and Google in separate legal sagas with billions of euros at play.
The decisions give a boost to the bloc's outgoing competition chief, Margrethe Vestager, who had suffered a series of setbacks in EU courts against her decisions.
Concluding a long-running legal battle, the European Court of Justice, the bloc's highest court, ruled that the iPhone maker must pay 13 billion euros ($14.3 billion) in back-taxes to Ireland.
"The Court of Justice gives final judgment in the matter and confirms the European Commission's 2016 decision: Ireland granted Apple unlawful aid which Ireland is required to recover," the court said in a statement.
Minutes later, the court also upheld a 2.4-billion-euro fine against Google, one of a string of high-profile EU competition cases targeting the tech giant.
The court dismissed an appeal by Google and its parent company Alphabet against the fine, slapped on the search engine in 2017 for abusing its dominant position by favouring its own comparison shopping service.
- Sweetheart tax arrangements -
One of the most bitter legal battles between the European Commission and big tech, the Apple case dates back to 2016 when the EU's executive arm claimed Ireland allowed the iPhone maker to avoid billions of euros in taxes.
By the commission's calculations, Dublin allowed Apple to pay a tax rate of one percent of its European profits in 2003 which then dropped to 0.005 percent by 2014.
It was one of several investigations over the previous decade into sweetheart tax arrangements between major companies and several EU countries.
The iPhone maker gained the upper hand in the Ireland case in 2020, when the EU's General Court annulled the order for it to pay the taxes owed -- a decision Brussels appealed.
The legal adviser of the higher European Court of Justice in November last year recommended scrapping that decision, saying it was peppered with legal errors.
But the top court, which could have sent the case back to the lower court, decided to rule that Apple should pay the back-taxes.
- Google's vice tightening -
The decisions will offer relief for Brussels which has faced difficulty defending its tax enforcement moves in recent years, with previous cases lost against Amazon and Starbucks.
The EU fine against Google was one of several record penalties imposed for violating EU competition rules, totalling around eight billion euros between 2017 and 2019.
Google faces yet another test next week when the top EU court will decide on the smallest of those fines, worth around 1.49 billion euros.
Legal headaches for Google are mounting across the Atlantic as well.
A trial began on Monday in the United States where the government accuses Google of dominating online advertising and stifling competition.
It comes after a US judge ruled last month that Google maintained a monopoly with its search engine.
Google's so-called ad tech -- the system that decides which online adverts people see and how much they cost -- is an area of particular concern for regulators worldwide.
Brussels in a preliminary finding last year accused Google of abusing its dominance of the online ad market and recommended the US company sell part of its ad services to ensure fair competition. Google had the right to respond and the probe remains open.
Separately, Britain's competition watchdog on Friday concluded Google employs "anti-competitive practices" with regards to online advertising after a two-year investigation.
A.AlHaj--SF-PST