-
Millions may be forced to move as climate change hits South Asia: UN
-
Chelsea captain James has knee surgery
-
Four killed battling Indonesia fires as toxic haze cloaks region
-
China tells Trump's press secretary to visit 'more often' after toilet comments
-
Thai farmers, fishermen challenge IMF, World Bank at Bangkok rally
-
'Under attack' from fragrance, Hanoi prunes its famous blossoms
-
In Malaysia, frustration grows over Indonesia haze
-
Families of children killed in Pakistan school roof collapse demand justice
-
Why India's voter revision drive has stoked fear and anger
-
Asian stocks rise as tech bounces from rout, Warsh upbeat on AI
-
Munster eye fitting tribute to 'special' Foley in Racing reunion
-
Trump's new press secretary says China lacked 'proper' toilets
-
Shooter kills teacher, three children at Oregon elementary school
-
India closes down New Delhi park ahead of 'cockroach' movement rally
-
Fed's Warsh surprised by world economy's 'resilience'
-
'Let us build': World Bank chief outlines jobs-led development agenda
-
Four killed in Indonesia battling fires causing toxic haze
-
Broncos top Super Bowl champion Seahawks in overtime
-
New Zealand star Ponga breaks arm in Rugby League World Cup opener
-
Brilliant Brewers sweep Dodgers to reach World Series
-
Indonesian stocks dive 11% as MSCI weighs market reclassification
-
Brewers complete Dodgers sweep to reach World Series
-
Seoul dismisses Pyongyang's scepticism over hypersonic weapon test
-
High-flying Freiburg try to shut out the noise as fairytale run continues
-
Yamal on song as entertainers Barcelona face Betis challenge
-
Flamengo secure 0-0 draw in La Plata in Copa Libertadores semi
-
Wong weighs haze prosecutions as Singapore air quality worsens
-
The final lap? Two days on the campaign trail with Trump
-
Brush fire prompts an evacuation order along Los Angeles coast
-
Asian stocks rise as tech bounces from rout, eyes on Warsh
-
'Mixed feelings': AI cracks centuries-old ciphers
-
Saudi organisers say 2027 Asian Cup 'on schedule' after attacks
-
Le Pen looms large as Macron enters final months on EU stage
-
Right-wing Brazil influencers on 'mission' to seal Bolsonaro win
-
Three children, one teacher killed in Oregon elementary school shooting
-
Using AI to help find Mexico's legions of missing children
-
Man Utd teetering towards crisis as Man City cloud hangs over Premier League
-
Fiji to deploy solar-powered Australian military drones at sea
-
Trump's new press secretary defends 'lawyer' title
-
'Multiple victims' in Oregon elementary school shooting, police say
-
Wallabies coach has 'faith' as All Blacks juggernaut awaits
-
'Multiple victims' in Oregon elementary school shooting: police
-
Ailing UK director Mike Leigh wishes he could make '100 more films'
-
ChangeNOW Announces NOW AI After Resolving Website Integration Vulnerability
-
Pixagram Announces Free Account Creation for 250 New Users Daily Through 2026
-
Argentine demonstration over education cuts ends in clashes
-
Macron warns urgent to strike EU budget deal before French vote runup
-
Argentine protesters, police clash at demo over university funding
-
Zelensky rallies European allies as Trump ties slump
-
US stocks end higher as AI shares stabilize
South Korea court recognises rights of same-sex couples
South Korea's Supreme Court recognised new rights for same-sex couples Thursday, saying the state must provide health insurance for a gay man's partner in a landmark ruling that left activists weeping for joy.
"National Health Insurance should recognise spousal insurance coverage for same-sex couples," the court ruled, with activists breaking into cheers as the verdict was read out.
The verdict, which cannot be appealed as it comes from the country's highest court, means common-law spouses of the same sex can now register as dependents on their partners' health insurance.
"It is discrimination based on sexual orientation to exclude the couple just because they are same-sex," the court ruled.
"It is a discriminatory act that violates human dignity and values, the right to pursue happiness, freedom of privacy, and the right to be equal before the law, and the degree of infringement is serious."
The case was brought by a gay couple, So Seong-wook and Kim Yong-min, who live together and held a wedding ceremony in 2019.
It had no legal validity, however, as South Korea does not recognise same-sex marriage.
In 2021, So sued the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) because it terminated benefits for his partner -- whom he had registered as a dependent -- after discovering they were a gay couple.
In a landmark ruling last year, a Seoul High Court found in favour of the couple, mandating that the NHIS reinstate the dependent benefits.
The service, which grants spousal coverage benefits to common-law partners, appealed the decision, escalating the case to the Supreme Court.
- 'Historic victory' -
The Supreme Court ruling is a pivotal moment for the country's LGBTQI community, and people holding rainbow umbrellas walked out of the court, wiping away tears of joy.
While the country does not recognise same-sex marriages, gay relationships are not criminalised. LGBTQ people tend to live largely under the radar.
Activists have long emphasised the need for legislation against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
A much-discussed anti-discrimination law has languished in the South Korean parliament for years, due to a lack of consensus among MPs.
Outside the court ahead of the verdict, anti-LGBTQI Christian organisations staged a protest, holding up banners saying "let us repent to the Lord".
When the couple So Seong-wook and Kim Yong-min attempted to hold a press conference after the verdict, Christian activists disrupted it by speaking in tongues and shouting: "homosexuality is a sin!"
Amnesty International said the ruling was "a historic victory for equality and human rights in South Korea".
"The Court has taken a significant step towards dismantling systemic discrimination and ensuring inclusivity for all," the rights group said in a statement.
"While this decision is a major milestone, the case itself is a sobering reminder of the lengthy judicial processes that same-sex couples must endure to secure basic rights that should be universally guaranteed.
"It is disheartening that in 2024, same-sex couples still face such significant barriers to equality."
P.AbuBaker--SF-PST