-
Staal shines as Carolina beat Vegas 5-3 to level Stanley Cup Final
-
Messi scores on injury return as Argentina beat Iceland in World Cup warm-up
-
Art, maths and killing: Ukraine drone chief's formula to stop Russia
-
Tech leads Asia losses, oil rises as rollercoaster week rumbles on
-
Messi set to return as Somali referee says World Cup dream over
-
Former Wallabies skipper Wright signs for Welsh club Ospreys
-
Pope to bless Barcelona's Sagrada Familia, world's tallest church
-
Emotional World Cup return to Mexico for South Africa coach Broos
-
Bill Gates faces questioning in US Congress over Epstein ties
-
'The Donald of Dubai': property tycoon seeks to become data king
-
PGA Tour to co-sanction Australian Open in global push
-
Elon Musk, after DOGE and politics, bets on SpaceX IPO
-
Saudis in World Cup spotlight after $2bn spending spree
-
Mexico doubles down on security before 2026 World Cup
-
US must not be 'too honest' at World Cup, says Roldan
-
Italian astronaut to pilot Artemis III mission
-
North Korea says Xi's visit produced 'far-reaching blueprint' for ties
-
Benfica say farewell to Mourinho as Real Madrid return nears
-
Protesters torch buildings and vehicles, block roads over Belfast stabbing
-
US strikes Iran after Apache helicopter downing
-
Threats to US lawmakers spiked after Meta eased moderation: watchdog
-
Nick Reiner seeks trust fund money for parent murder defense
-
Spain, France qualify for 2027 Women's World Cup as England wait
-
Protesters torch building and vehicles, block roads over Belfast stabbing
-
A woman in charge of the UN? Candidates feel it's about time
-
US tech shares resume sell-off while oil prices retreat
-
Protesters block road to Mexican World Cup stadium
-
White House World Cup chief defends visa ban for Somali referee, Iranians
-
Serena back in the groove on triumphant return to tennis
-
'It doesn't matter': US star Reyna looks past World Cup scandal
-
Somali referee says World Cup 'dream' ruined
-
Knicks ready to 'throw the first punch' in NBA Finals
-
'Beaten to death': the grim toll of Ecuador's security crackdown
-
Anthropic opens most powerful AI model to public with safeguards
-
Serena Williams makes winning return in Queen's Club doubles
-
Trump vows response after Iran shoots down US helicopter
-
Real Madrid's 150 mn euros bid for Atletico's Alvarez rejected
-
Spurs handling physicality of Knicks and New York hostility
-
Peru election chief tells AFP count could take two weeks
-
Stokes considering England captaincy future after nightclub incident
-
Atalanta sack coach Palladino with Sarri set to arrive
-
Italian Luca Parmitano to be first European to join an Artemis mission: NASA
-
One killed as Kenyan protests at US Ebola centre turn violent
-
Somali government deeply regrets axing of referee from World Cup
-
Scotland First Minister vows to help fans refused entry for World Cup in US
-
Stocks slump as US tech rebound falters, oil dips below $90
-
Somalia backs referee after he is denied entry to US
-
Lord's pitch rated 'unsatisfactory' by ICC
-
Pope Leo XIV met Bad Bunny in Madrid on Monday: Vatican
-
Stocks turn lower as US tech rebound falters
Pitt sues Jolie over sale of French vineyard where they married
Brad Pitt is suing Angelina Jolie for selling her share of the French vineyard where they got married.
Superstars Pitt and Jolie, who were once Hollywood's highest profile couple, bought a controlling stake of Chateau Miraval in southern France in 2008, and tied the knot there six years later.
But they filed to dissolve their marriage in 2016 and have remained locked in court battles since, including over custody rights for their six children.
According to a lawsuit filed by Pitt in California on Thursday, the couple had "agreed they would never sell their respective interests in Miraval without the other's consent."
But last October, Jolie sold her stake to a "a Luxembourg-based spirits manufacturer controlled by Russian oligarch Yuri Shefler," the legal document obtained by AFP says.
Pitt's filing alleges that Jolie broke the terms of their original agreement by not offering him first refusal for her share, and that she is seeking to "recover unearned windfall profits for herself while inflicting gratuitous harm on Pitt."
"Jolie long ago stopped contributing to Miraval -- while Pitt poured money and sweat equity into the wine business, building it into the ascendant company it is today," it states.
Pitt's lawsuit requests a trial by jury.
It describes the vineyard as a "small, unprofitable wine business" that was "in need of renovation" prior to the couple's purchase in 2008.
The pair paid "approximately 25 million euros," with Pitt contributing 60 per cent and Jolie the remaining 40 per cent.
But Pitt went on to pay for renovations "in a manner far disproportionate to his relative ownership share" on the understanding Jolie would not pull out of the investment without his consent, the suit says.
Pitt brought in Marc Perrin, one of France's top winemakers, to help transform the business into a leading rose wine producer, but "Jolie had no involvement in these efforts," it continues.
Revenues reportedly grew from approximately $3 million in 2013 to more than $50 million last year.
Jolie's representatives did not immediately respond to an AFP request for comment.
The A-listers first became a couple after co-starring as married assassins in 2004 film "Mr. and Mrs. Smith." Pitt was married to Jennifer Aniston at the time.
Pitt, now 58, was accused of striking one of his children during a flight from France to Los Angeles shortly before Jolie filed for divorce, but was later cleared by the FBI and social workers.
The pair announced in 2018 they had reached an amicable settlement over the children -- three biological and three adopted.
But last July, Jolie scored a win in their custody battle as the private judge overseeing their divorce and custody matters was disqualified from the case.
Judge John Ouderkirk -- who had also officiated their wedding at the vineyard -- was found to have financially benefited from separate work with Pitt's attorneys, and disqualified from the case by a California appeals court.
The ruling means the custody case essentially had to be restarted before a new judge.
F.Qawasmeh--SF-PST