-
Dollar rises after Fed chair says December rate cut not a given
-
Google parent Alphabet posts first $100 bn quarter as AI drives growth
-
Rob Jetten: ex-athlete setting the pace in Dutch politics
-
Juve bounce back after Tudor sacking as Roma keep pace with leaders Napoli
-
Favorite Sovereignty scratched from Breeders' Cup Classic after fever
-
Doue injured as PSG held at Lorient in Ligue 1
-
Leverkusen win late in German Cup, Stuttgart progress
-
Jihadist fuel blockade makes life a struggle in Mali's capital
-
Uber plans San Francisco robotaxis in Waymo challenge
-
Paramilitary chief vows united Sudan as his forces are accused of mass killings
-
Trump, Xi to meet seeking truce in damaging trade war
-
Over 100 killed in Rio police crackdown on powerful narco gang
-
Divided US Fed backs second quarter-point rate cut of 2025
-
'Amazing' feeling for Rees-Zammit on Wales return after NFL adventure
-
'Cruel' police raids help, not hinder, Rio's criminal gangs: expert
-
S. African president eyes better US tariff deal 'soon'
-
Sinner cruises in Paris Masters opener, Zverev keeps title defence alive
-
Winter Olympics - 100 days to go to 'unforgettable Games'
-
Kiwi Plumtree to step down as Sharks head coach
-
France to charge Louvre heist suspects with theft and conspiracy
-
US media mogul John Malone to step down as head of business empire
-
'Never been this bad': Jamaica surveys ruins in hurricane's wake
-
France adopts consent-based rape law
-
Zverev survives scare to kickstart Paris Masters title defence
-
Rabat to host 2026 African World Cup play-offs
-
Wolvaardt-inspired South Africa crush England to reach Women's World Cup final
-
US says not withdrawing from Europe after troops cut
-
WHO urges Sudan ceasefire after alleged massacres in El-Fasher
-
Under-fire UK govt deports migrant sex offender with £500
-
AI chip giant Nvidia becomes world's first $5 trillion company
-
Arsenal depth fuels Saka's belief in Premier League title charge
-
Startup Character.AI to ban direct chat for minors after teen suicide
-
132 killed in massive Rio police crackdown on gang: public defender
-
Pedri joins growing Barcelona sickbay
-
Zambia and former Chelsea manager Grant part ways
-
Russia sends teen who performed anti-war songs back to jail
-
Caribbean reels from hurricane as homes, streets destroyed
-
Boeing reports $5.4-bn loss on large hit from 777X aircraft delays
-
Real Madrid's Vinicius says sorry for Clasico substitution huff
-
Dutch vote in snap election seen as test for Europe's far-right
-
Jihadist fuel blockade makes daily life a struggle for Bamako residents
-
De Bruyne goes under the knife for hamstring injury
-
Wolvaardt's 169 fires South Africa to 319-7 in World Cup semis
-
EU seeks 'urgent solutions' with China over chipmaker Nexperia
-
Paris prosecutor promises update in Louvre heist probe
-
Funds for climate adaptation 'lifeline' far off track: UN
-
Record Vietnam rains kill seven and flood 100,000 homes
-
Markets extend record run as trade dominates
-
Sudan govt accuses RSF of attacking mosques in El-Fasher takeover
-
Rain washes out 1st Australia-India T20 match
Pitt sues Jolie over sale of French vineyard where they married
Brad Pitt is suing Angelina Jolie for selling her share of the French vineyard where they got married.
Superstars Pitt and Jolie, who were once Hollywood's highest profile couple, bought a controlling stake of Chateau Miraval in southern France in 2008, and tied the knot there six years later.
But they filed to dissolve their marriage in 2016 and have remained locked in court battles since, including over custody rights for their six children.
According to a lawsuit filed by Pitt in California on Thursday, the couple had "agreed they would never sell their respective interests in Miraval without the other's consent."
But last October, Jolie sold her stake to a "a Luxembourg-based spirits manufacturer controlled by Russian oligarch Yuri Shefler," the legal document obtained by AFP says.
Pitt's filing alleges that Jolie broke the terms of their original agreement by not offering him first refusal for her share, and that she is seeking to "recover unearned windfall profits for herself while inflicting gratuitous harm on Pitt."
"Jolie long ago stopped contributing to Miraval -- while Pitt poured money and sweat equity into the wine business, building it into the ascendant company it is today," it states.
Pitt's lawsuit requests a trial by jury.
It describes the vineyard as a "small, unprofitable wine business" that was "in need of renovation" prior to the couple's purchase in 2008.
The pair paid "approximately 25 million euros," with Pitt contributing 60 per cent and Jolie the remaining 40 per cent.
But Pitt went on to pay for renovations "in a manner far disproportionate to his relative ownership share" on the understanding Jolie would not pull out of the investment without his consent, the suit says.
Pitt brought in Marc Perrin, one of France's top winemakers, to help transform the business into a leading rose wine producer, but "Jolie had no involvement in these efforts," it continues.
Revenues reportedly grew from approximately $3 million in 2013 to more than $50 million last year.
Jolie's representatives did not immediately respond to an AFP request for comment.
The A-listers first became a couple after co-starring as married assassins in 2004 film "Mr. and Mrs. Smith." Pitt was married to Jennifer Aniston at the time.
Pitt, now 58, was accused of striking one of his children during a flight from France to Los Angeles shortly before Jolie filed for divorce, but was later cleared by the FBI and social workers.
The pair announced in 2018 they had reached an amicable settlement over the children -- three biological and three adopted.
But last July, Jolie scored a win in their custody battle as the private judge overseeing their divorce and custody matters was disqualified from the case.
Judge John Ouderkirk -- who had also officiated their wedding at the vineyard -- was found to have financially benefited from separate work with Pitt's attorneys, and disqualified from the case by a California appeals court.
The ruling means the custody case essentially had to be restarted before a new judge.
F.Qawasmeh--SF-PST